The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abrogation of disease development in plants expressing animal antiapoptotic genes
Open accessAbstract
An emerging topic in plant biology is whether plants display analogous elements of mammalian programmed cell death during development and defense against pathogen attack. In many plant–pathogen interactions, plant cell death occurs in both susceptible and resistant host responses. For example, specific recognition responses in plants trigger formation of the hypersensitive response and activation of host defense mechanisms, resulting in restriction of pathogen growth and disease development. Several studies indicate that cell death during hypersensitive response involves activation of a plant-encoded pathway for cell death. Many susceptible interactions also result in host cell death, although it is not clear how or if the host participates in this response. We have generated transgenic tobacco plants to express animal genes that negatively regulate apoptosis. Plants expressing human Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, nematode CED-9, or baculovirus Op-IAP transgenes conferred heritable resistance to several necrotrophic fungal pathogens, suggesting that disease development required host–cell death pathways. In addition, the transgenic tobacco plants displayed resistance to a necrogenic virus. Transgenic tobacco harboring Bcl-xl with a loss-of-function mutation did not protect against pathogen challenge. We also show that discrete DNA fragmentation (laddering) occurred in susceptible tobacco during fungal infection, but does not occur in transgenic-resistant plants. Our data indicate that in compatible plant–pathogen interactions apoptosis-like programmed cell death occurs. Further, these animal antiapoptotic genes function in plants and should be useful to delineate resistance pathways. These genes also have the potential to generate effective disease resistance in economically important crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens
Zheng, Z., Qamar, S. A., Chen, Z., & Mengiste, T. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02901.x · Cited by 988
Mengiste, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172955 · Cited by 566
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Responses in Plants
Howell, S. H. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120053 · Cited by 560
Controlled cell death, plant survival and development
Lam, E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1358 · Cited by 554
Mengiste, T., Chen, X., Salmeron, J., & Dietrich, R. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.014167 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickman, M. B., Park, Y. K., Oltersdorf, T., Li, W., Clemente, T., & French, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-05-29
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6957-6962
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2067431766
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abrogation of disease development in plants expressing animal antiapoptotic genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.091108998
- The paper
- Dickman, M. B., Park, Y. K., Oltersdorf, T., Li, W., Clemente, T., & French, R. (2001). Abrogation of disease development in plants expressing animal antiapoptotic genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091108998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.