The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global terrestrial biosphere
Open accessAbstract
Loss of nitrogen (N) from land limits the uptake and storage of atmospheric CO 2 by the biosphere, influencing Earth's climate system and myriads of the global ecological functions and services on which humans rely. Nitrogen can be lost in both dissolved and gaseous phases; however, the partitioning of these vectors remains controversial. Particularly uncertain is whether the bacterial conversion of plant available N to gaseous forms (denitrification) plays a major role in structuring global N supplies in the nonagrarian centers of Earth. Here, we use the isotope composition of N ( 15 N/ 14 N) to constrain the transfer of this nutrient from the land to the water and atmosphere. We report that the integrated 15 N/ 14 N of the natural terrestrial biosphere is elevated with respect to that of atmospheric N inputs. This cannot be explained by preferential loss of 14 N to waterways; rather, it reflects a history of low 15 N/ 14 N gaseous N emissions to the atmosphere owing to denitrifying bacteria in the soil. Parameterizing a simple model with global N isotope data, we estimate that soil denitrification (including N 2 ) accounts for ≈1/3 of the total N lost from the unmanaged terrestrial biosphere. Applying this fraction to estimates of N inputs, N 2 O and NO x fluxes, we calculate that ≈28 Tg of N are lost annually via N 2 efflux from the natural soil. These results place isotopic constraints on the widely held belief that denitrifying bacteria account for a significant fraction of the missing N in the global N cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,679
Cited by
Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Menge, D. N. L., Reed, S. C., & Cleveland, C. C. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0119 · Cited by 800
Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Schlesinger, W. H. (2013) · Oxford Bibliographies in Ecology · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0111 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlton, B. Z., & Bai, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-12-22
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 21713-21716
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2019954536
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global terrestrial biosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0912111106
- The paper
- Houlton, B. Z., & Bai, E. (2009). Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global terrestrial biosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912111106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.