The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation
Open accessAbstract
The majority (∼70%) of surface buried in protein folding is hydrocarbon, whereas in DNA helix formation, the majority (∼65%) of surface buried is relatively polar nitrogen and oxygen. Our previous quantification of salt exclusion from hydrocarbon (C) accessible surface area ( ASA ) and accumulation at amide nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O) ASA leads to a prediction of very different Hofmeister effects on processes that bury mostly polar (N, O) surface compared to the range of effects commonly observed for processes that bury mainly nonpolar (C) surface, e.g., micelle formation and protein folding. Here we quantify the effects of salts on folding of the monomeric DNA binding domain (DBD) of lac repressor ( lac DBD) and on formation of an oligomeric DNA duplex. In accord with this prediction, no salt investigated has a stabilizing Hofmeister effect on DNA helix formation. Our ASA -based analyses of model compound data and estimates of the surface area buried in protein folding and DNA helix formation allow us to predict Hofmeister effects on these processes. We observe semiquantitative to quantitative agreement between these predictions and the experimental values, obtained from a novel separation of coulombic and Hofmeister effects. Possible explanations of deviations, including salt-dependent unfolded ensembles and interactions with other types of surface, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and Flexibility Adaptation in Nonspecific and Specific Protein-DNA Complexes
Kalodimos, C. G., Biris, N., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Levandoski, M. M., Guennuegues, M., Boelens, R., & Kaptein, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097064 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Effects of Molecular Crowding on the Structures, Interactions, and Functions of Nucleic Acids
Nakano, S.-I., Miyoshi, D., & Sugimoto, N. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400113m · Cited by 567
The Metabolome Weakens RNA Thermodynamic Stability and Strengthens RNA Chemical Stability
Sieg, J. P., McKinley, L. N., Huot, M. J., Yennawar, N. H., & Bevilacqua, P. C. (2022) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00488 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Pegram, L. M., Wendorff, T., Erdmann, R., Shkel, I., Bellissimo, D., Felitsky, D. J., & Record, M. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-04-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7716-7721
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2083531736
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0913376107
- The paper
- Pegram, L. M., Wendorff, T., Erdmann, R., Shkel, I., Bellissimo, D., Felitsky, D. J., & Record, M. T. (2010). Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913376107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.