The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species
Open accessAbstract
Despite the severe ecological and economic damage caused by introduced species, factors that allow invaders to become successful often remain elusive. Of invasive taxa, ants are among the most widespread and harmful. Highly invasive ants are often unicolonial, forming supercolonies in which workers and queens mix freely among physically separate nests. By reducing costs associated with territoriality, unicolonial species can attain high worker densities, allowing them to achieve interspecific dominance. Here we examine the behavior and population genetics of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in its native and introduced ranges, and we provide a mechanism to explain its success as an invader. Using microsatellite markers, we show that a population bottleneck has reduced the genetic diversity of introduced populations. This loss is associated with reduced intraspecific aggression among spatially separate nests, and leads to the formation of interspecifically dominant supercolonies. In contrast, native populations are more genetically variable and exhibit pronounced intraspecific aggression. Although reductions in genetic diversity are generally considered detrimental, these findings provide an example of how a genetic bottleneck can lead to widespread ecological success. In addition, these results provide insights into the origin and evolution of unicoloniality, which is often considered a challenge to kin selection theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The population biology of invasive species
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C., et al. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037 · Cited by 3,912
Evolutionary genetics of invasive species
Lee, C. E. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02554-5 · Cited by 1,771
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization
Olden, J. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E., & Fausch, K. D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010 · Cited by 1,573
Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts
Chown, S. L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2006) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(06)33002-0 · Cited by 573
The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions
SUAREZ, A. V., & TSUTSUI, N. D. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03456.x · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A., & Case, T. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-05-16
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5948-5953
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2021369564
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.100110397
- The paper
- Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A., & Case, T. J. (2000). Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100110397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.