The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theory for polymer analysis using nanopore-based single-molecule mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Nanometer-scale pores have demonstrated potential for the electrical detection, quantification, and characterization of molecules for biomedical applications and the chemical analysis of polymers. Despite extensive research in the nanopore sensing field, there is a paucity of theoretical models that incorporate the interactions between chemicals (i.e., solute, solvent, analyte, and nanopore). Here, we develop a model that simultaneously describes both the current blockade depth and residence times caused by individual poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) molecules in a single α-hemolysin ion channel. Modeling polymer-cation binding leads to a description of two significant effects: a reduction in the mobile cation concentration inside the pore and an increase in the affinity between the polymer and the pore. The model was used to estimate the free energy of formation for K + -PEG inside the nanopore (≈-49.7 meV) and the free energy of PEG partitioning into the nanopore (≈0.76 meV per ethylene glycol monomer). The results suggest that rational, physical models for the analysis of analyte-nanopore interactions will develop the full potential of nanopore-based sensing for chemical and biological applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Real-time shape approximation and fingerprinting of single proteins using a nanopore
Yusko, E. C., Bruhn, B. R., Eggenberger, O. M., Houghtaling, J., Rollings, R. C., Walsh, N. C., Nandivada, S., Pindrus, M., Hall, A. R., Sept, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.267 · Cited by 473
Encoding information into polymers
Rutten, M. G. T. A., Vaandrager, F. W., Elemans, J. A. A. W., & Nolte, R. J. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0051-5 · Cited by 216
Breton, M. F., Discala, F., Bacri, L., Foster, D., Pelta, J., & Oukhaled, A. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz400938q · Cited by 63
Poudel, L., Podgornik, R., & Ching, W.-Y. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.7b04061 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiner, J. E., Kasianowicz, J. J., Nablo, B. J., & Robertson, J. W. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 12080-12085
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2160947742
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory for polymer analysis using nanopore-based single-molecule mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1002194107
- The paper
- Reiner, J. E., Kasianowicz, J. J., Nablo, B. J., & Robertson, J. W. F. (2010). Theory for polymer analysis using nanopore-based single-molecule mass spectrometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002194107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.