The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial nanowires are extracellular appendages that have been suggested as pathways for electron transport in phylogenetically diverse microorganisms, including dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria and photosynthetic cyanobacteria. However, there has been no evidence presented to demonstrate electron transport along the length of bacterial nanowires. Here we report electron transport measurements along individually addressed bacterial nanowires derived from electron-acceptor–limited cultures of the dissimilatory metal-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Transport along the bacterial nanowires was independently evaluated by two techniques: ( i ) nanofabricated electrodes patterned on top of individual nanowires, and ( ii ) conducting probe atomic force microscopy at various points along a single nanowire bridging a metallic electrode and the conductive atomic force microscopy tip. The S. oneidensis MR-1 nanowires were found to be electrically conductive along micrometer-length scales with electron transport rates up to 10 9 /s at 100 mV of applied bias and a measured resistivity on the order of 1 Ω·cm. Mutants deficient in genes for c -type decaheme cytochromes MtrC and OmcA produce appendages that are morphologically consistent with bacterial nanowires, but were found to be nonconductive. The measurements reported here allow for bacterial nanowires to serve as a viable microbial strategy for extracellular electron transport.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., & Woodward, J. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382445a0 · Cited by 1,834
Cited by
The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895555 · Cited by 1,347
An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron
Kappler, A., Bryce, C., Mansor, M., Lueder, U., Byrne, J. M., & Swanner, E. D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-00502-7 · Cited by 854
Carbon‐Based Microbial‐Fuel‐Cell Electrodes: From Conductive Supports to Active Catalysts
Li, S., Cheng, C., & Thomas, A. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602547 · Cited by 423
Microbial Nanowires: A New Paradigm for Biological Electron Transfer and Bioelectronics
Malvankar, N. S., & Lovley, D. R. (2012) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100733 · Cited by 316
Patel, S. K. S., Das, D., Kim, S. C., Cho, B.-K., Kalia, V. C., & Lee, J.-K. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111491 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Naggar, M. Y., Wanger, G., Leung, K. M., Yuzvinsky, T. D., Southam, G., Yang, J., Lau, W. M., Nealson, K. H., & Gorby, Y. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-10-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 18127-18131
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988673993
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1004880107
- The paper
- El-Naggar, M. Y., Wanger, G., Leung, K. M., Yuzvinsky, T. D., Southam, G., Yang, J., Lau, W. M., Nealson, K. H., & Gorby, Y. A. (2010). Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004880107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.