Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotypic heterogeneity and instability of human ovarian tumor-initiating cells

Open access
Stewart, Jocelyn M., Shaw, Patricia A., Gedye, Craig, Bernardini, Marcus Q., Neel, Benjamin G., Ailles, Laurie E.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) model proposes that tumors have a hierarchical organization in which only some cells indefinitely self-renew and thereby sustain tumor growth. In addition, the CSC model requires that tumor-initiating cells (TICs) be prospectively isolatable on the basis of their phenotype. Previous studies have suggested that serous ovarian cancer (SOC) conforms to the CSC model, but these used arguably nonfidelitous immortalized cell lines, cultured primary cells, or passaged xenografts as the source of tumor cells. We developed a robust assay for quantifying TICs from primary SOC. Using this assay, we find that TICs are rare when assayed in either NOD/SCID or NOD/SCID/IL2Rγ −/− (NSG) mice. TIC frequency (TICf) varies substantially between patients, although it is similar in primary ovarian masses and omental metastases, suggesting that TICf is an intrinsic property of ovarian tumors. CD133 marks all TICs from several primary SOC cases. However, in other cases, substantial TIC activity is found in both the CD133 + and CD133 − fractions, whereas still other cases have exclusively CD133 − TICs. Furthermore, the TIC phenotype can change in xenografts: primary tumors in which all TICs are CD133 + can give rise to xenografts that contain substantial numbers of CD133 − TICs. Our results highlight the need for quantitative rigor in the evaluation of TICs and for caution when using passaged xenografts for such studies. Furthermore, although our data suggest that SOC conforms to the CSC hypothesis, the heterogeneity of the TIC phenotype may complicate its clinical application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1005529108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Stewart, J. M., Shaw, P. A., Gedye, C., Bernardini, M. Q., Neel, B. G., & Ailles, L. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-03-30
Volume
108
Issue
16
Pages
6468-6473
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979830686
Cited by
209
References
2
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotypic heterogeneity and instability of human ovarian tumor-initiating cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1005529108
The paper
Stewart, J. M., Shaw, P. A., Gedye, C., Bernardini, M. Q., Neel, B. G., & Ailles, L. E. (2011). Phenotypic heterogeneity and instability of human ovarian tumor-initiating cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005529108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.