The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network
Open accessAbstract
Cells have an internal compass that enables them to move along shallow chemical gradients. As amoeboid cells migrate, signaling events such as Ras and PI3K activation occur spontaneously on pseudopodia. Uniform stimuli trigger a symmetric response, whereupon cells stop and round up; then localized patches of activity appear as cells spread. Finally cells adapt and resume random migration. In contrast, chemotactic gradients continuously direct signaling events to the front of the cell. Local-excitation, global-inhibition (LEGI) and reaction–diffusion models have captured some of these features of chemotaxing cells, but no system has explained the complex response kinetics, sensitivity to shallow gradients, or the role of recently observed propagating waves within the actin cytoskeleton. We report here that Ras and PI3K activation move in phase with the cytoskeleton events and, drawing on all of these observations, propose the LEGI-biased excitable network hypothesis. We formulate a model that simulates most of the behaviors of chemotactic cells: In the absence of stimulation, there are spontaneous spots of activity. Stimulus increments trigger an initial burst of patches followed by localized secondary events. After a few minutes, the system adapts, again displaying random activity. In gradients, the activity patches are directed continuously and selectively toward the chemoattractant, providing an extraordinary degree of amplification. Importantly, by perturbing model parameters, we generate distinct behaviors consistent with known classes of mutants. Our study brings together heretofore diverse observations on spontaneous cytoskeletal activity, signaling responses to temporal stimuli, and spatial gradient sensing into a unified scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Materials learning from life: concepts for active, adaptive and autonomous molecular systems
Merindol, R., & Walther, A. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00738d · Cited by 533
Diz-Muñoz, A., Thurley, K., Chintamen, S., Altschuler, S. J., Wu, L. F., Fletcher, D. A., & Weiner, O. D. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002474 · Cited by 187
Relaxation oscillations and hierarchy of feedbacks in MAPK signaling
Kochańczyk, M., Kocieniewski, P., Kozłowska, E., Jaruszewicz-Błońska, J., Sparta, B., Pargett, M., Albeck, J. G., Hlavacek, W. S., & Lipniacki, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38244 · Cited by 59
Ho, K. K. Y., Srivastava, S., Kinnunen, P. C., Garikipati, K., Luker, G. D., & Luker, K. E. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020269 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, Y., Huang, C.-H., Iglesias, P. A., & Devreotes, P. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-09-23
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 17079-17086
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2078423846
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1011271107
- The paper
- Xiong, Y., Huang, C.-H., Iglesias, P. A., & Devreotes, P. N. (2010). Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011271107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.