Correlated genotypes in friendship networks
Open accessAbstract
It is well known that humans tend to associate with other humans who have similar characteristics, but it is unclear whether this tendency has consequences for the distribution of genotypes in a population. Although geneticists have shown that populations tend to stratify genetically, this process results from geographic sorting or assortative mating, and it is unknown whether genotypes may be correlated as a consequence of nonreproductive associations or other processes. Here, we study six available genotypes from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to test for genetic similarity between friends. Maps of the friendship networks show clustering of genotypes and, after we apply strict controls for population stratification, the results show that one genotype is positively correlated (homophily) and one genotype is negatively correlated (heterophily). A replication study in an independent sample from the Framingham Heart Study verifies that DRD2 exhibits significant homophily and that CYP2A6 exhibits significant heterophily. These unique results show that homophily and heterophily obtain on a genetic (indeed, an allelic) level, which has implications for the study of population genetics and social behavior. In particular, the results suggest that association tests should include friends’ genes and that theories of evolution should take into account the fact that humans might, in some sense, be metagenomic with respect to the humans around them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Couples tend to pair on shared traits, including sub-clinical disease indicators, and this homophily enriches variants promoting those traits.
“Furthermore, homophily, the tendency for couples to pair on the basis of shared attributes (including sub-clinical disease indicators), will tend to enrich for variants that promote those attributes104.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [104]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 188
- Authors
- Fowler, J. H., Settle, J. E., & Christakis, N. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-01-18
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1993-1997
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3033315
- OpenAlex
- W2076328887
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG034420, P01AG031093)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, N01-HC-025195)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103504)
- National Center for Research Resources (P41RR031228)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- homophily, heterophily, friendship networks, genotype correlation, population stratification, DRD2, CYP2A6, allelic association, social networks, evolution of social behavior
- MeSH terms
- Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases, Genotype, Humans, Social Support, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Friends, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2A6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review