Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing

Open access
Shearer, A. Eliot, DeLuca, Adam P., Hildebrand, Michael S., Taylor, Kyle R., Gurrola, José, Scherer, Steve, Scheetz, Todd E., Smith, Richard J. H.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The extreme genetic heterogeneity of nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) makes genetic diagnosis expensive and time consuming using available methods. To assess the feasibility of target-enrichment and massively parallel sequencing technologies to interrogate all exons of all genes implicated in NSHL, we tested nine patients diagnosed with hearing loss. Solid-phase (NimbleGen) or solution-based (SureSelect) sequence capture, followed by 454 or Illumina sequencing, respectively, were compared. Sequencing reads were mapped using GSMAPPER, BFAST, and BOWTIE, and pathogenic variants were identified using a custom-variant calling and annotation pipeline (ASAP) that incorporates publicly available in silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, BLOSUM, Polyphen2, and Align-GVGD). Samples included one negative control, three positive controls (one biological replicate), and six unknowns (10 samples total), in which we genotyped 605 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by Sanger sequencing to measure sensitivity and specificity for SureSelect-Illumina and NimbleGen-454 methods at saturating sequence coverage. Causative mutations were identified in the positive controls but not in the negative control. In five of six idiopathic hearing loss patients we identified the pathogenic mutation. Massively parallel sequencing technologies provide sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility at levels sufficient to perform genetic diagnosis of hearing loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1012989107

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Shearer, A. E., DeLuca, A. P., Hildebrand, M. S., Taylor, K. R., Gurrola, J., Scherer, S., Scheetz, T. E., & Smith, R. J. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
107
Issue
49
Pages
21104-21109
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1968852642
Cited by
340
References
5
FWCI
14.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1012989107
The paper
Shearer, A. E., DeLuca, A. P., Hildebrand, M. S., Taylor, K. R., Gurrola, J., Scherer, S., Scheetz, T. E., & Smith, R. J. H. (2010). Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012989107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.