The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts
Open accessAbstract
We lack a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary pattern and process because short-term and long-term data have rarely been combined into a single analytical framework. Here we test alternative models of phenotypic evolution using a dataset of unprecedented size and temporal span (over 8,000 data points). The data are body-size measurements taken from historical studies, the fossil record, and among-species comparative data representing mammals, squamates, and birds. By analyzing this large dataset, we identify stochastic models that can explain evolutionary patterns on both short and long timescales and reveal a remarkably consistent pattern in the timing of divergence across taxonomic groups. Even though rapid, short-term evolution often occurs in intervals shorter than 1 Myr, the changes are constrained and do not accumulate over time. Over longer intervals (1–360 Myr), this pattern of bounded evolution yields to a pattern of increasing divergence with time. The best-fitting model to explain this pattern is a model that combines rare but substantial bursts of phenotypic change with bounded fluctuations on shorter timescales. We suggest that these rare bursts reflect permanent changes in adaptive zones, whereas the short-term fluctuations represent local variations in niche optima due to restricted environmental variation within a stable adaptive zone.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A wide breadth of macroevolutionary data suggest that abrupt shifts and discontinuities have been a major feature of life on Earth.
“a wide breadth of macroevolutionary data suggest that abrupt shifts and discontinuities have been a major feature of life on Earth”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Uyeda et al. 2011
The paper’s opening section reports that a model combining rare, substantial bursts of phenotypic change with shorter-term bounded fluctuations best fits its data. But those data chiefly concern body size in mammals, squamates, and birds; they do not establish that abrupt shifts and discontinuities have been a major feature of life on Earth generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974 · see citing works
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [42]Williams GC (1992) Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
- [43]Thompson JN (2005) The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Self-citationNuclear genomic sequences reveal that polar bears are an old and distinct bear lineage
Hailer, F., Kutschera, V. E., Hallström, B. M., Klassert, D., Fain, S. R., Leonard, J. A., Arnason, U., & Janke, A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216424 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Scientific novelty beyond the experiment
Hallsworth, J. E., Udaondo, Z., Pedrós‐Alió, C., Höfer, J., Benison, K. C., Lloyd, K. G., Cordero, R. J. B., de Campos, C. B. L., Yakimov, M. M., & Amils, R. (2023) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14222 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Uyeda, J. C., Hansen, T. F., Arnold, S. J., & Pienaar, J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-08-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 15908-15913
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3179053
- OpenAlex
- W2021134444
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- macroevolution, phenotypic evolution, body size evolution, adaptive zones, mammals, Squamata, birds
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Lizards, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Stochastic Processes, Time Factors, Genetic Variation, Models, Statistical, Linear Models, Body Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review