The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activatable aptamer probe for contrast-enhanced in vivo cancer imaging based on cell membrane protein-triggered conformation alteration
Open accessAbstract
Aptamers have emerged as promising molecular probes for in vivo cancer imaging, but the reported “always-on” aptamer probes remain problematic because of high background and limited contrast. To address this problem, we designed an activatable aptamer probe (AAP) targeting membrane proteins of living cancer cells and achieved contrast-enhanced cancer visualization inside mice. The AAP displayed a quenched fluorescence in its free state and underwent a conformational alteration upon binding to target cancer cells with an activated fluorescence. As proof of concept, in vitro analysis and in vivo imaging of CCRF-CEM cancer cells were performed by using the specific aptamer, sgc8, as a demonstration. It was confirmed that the AAP could be specifically activated by target cancer cells with a dramatic fluorescence enhancement and exhibit improved sensitivity for CCRF-CEM cell analysis with the cell number of 118 detected in 200 μl binding buffer. In vivo studies demonstrated that activated fluorescence signals were obviously achieved in the CCRF-CEM tumor sites in mice. Compared to always-on aptamer probes, the AAP could substantially minimize the background signal originating from nontarget tissues, thus resulting in significantly enhanced image contrast and shortened diagnosis time to 15 min. Furthermore, because of the specific affinity of sgc8 to target cancer cells, the AAP also showed desirable specificity in differentiating CCRF-CEM tumors from Ramos tumors and nontumor areas. The design concept can be widely adapted to other cancer cell-specific aptamer probes for in vivo molecular imaging of cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aptamers from Cell-Based Selection for Bioanalytical Applications
Tan, W., Donovan, M. J., & Jiang, J. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300468w · Cited by 649
Self-citationAptamer-integrated DNA nanostructures for biosensing, bioimaging and cancer therapy
Meng, H.-M., Liu, H., Kuai, H., Peng, R., Mo, L., & Zhang, X.-B. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00645g · Cited by 608
Aptamer-based targeted therapy
Zhu, G., & Chen, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.005 · Cited by 522
Precise nanomedicine for intelligent therapy of cancer
Chen, H., Gu, Z., An, H., Chen, C., Chen, J., Cui, R., Chen, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-018-9397-5 · Cited by 409
Self-citationWang, J., Zhu, G., You, M., Song, E., Shukoor, M. I., Zhang, K., Altman, M. B., Chen, Y., Zhu, Z., Huang, C. Z., et al. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn300694v · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, H., He, X., Wang, K., Wu, X., Ye, X., Guo, Q., Tan, W., Qing, Z., Yang, X., & Zhou, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-02-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3900-3905
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2135883962
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activatable aptamer probe for contrast-enhanced in vivo cancer imaging based on cell membrane protein-triggered conformation alteration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1016197108
- The paper
- Shi, H., He, X., Wang, K., Wu, X., Ye, X., Guo, Q., Tan, W., Qing, Z., Yang, X., & Zhou, B. (2011). Activatable aptamer probe for contrast-enhanced in vivo cancer imaging based on cell membrane protein-triggered conformation alteration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016197108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.