Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in a human host environment

Open access
Yang, Lei, Jelsbak, Lars, Marvig, Rasmus Lykke, Damkiær, Søren, Workman, Christopher T., Rau, Martin Holm, Hansen, Susse Kirkelund, Folkesson, Anders, Johansen, Helle Krogh, Ciofu, Oana, Høiby, Niels, Sommer, Morten O. A., Molin, Søren·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Laboratory evolution experiments have led to important findings relating organism adaptation and genomic evolution. However, continuous monitoring of long-term evolution has been lacking for natural systems, limiting our understanding of these processes in situ. Here we characterize the evolutionary dynamics of a lineage of a clinically important opportunistic bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , as it adapts to the airways of several individual cystic fibrosis patients over 200,000 bacterial generations, and provide estimates of mutation rates of bacteria in a natural environment. In contrast to predictions based on in vitro evolution experiments, we document limited diversification of the evolving lineage despite a highly structured and complex host environment. Notably, the lineage went through an initial period of rapid adaptation caused by a small number of mutations with pleiotropic effects, followed by a period of genetic drift with limited phenotypic change and a genomic signature of negative selection, suggesting that the evolving lineage has reached a major adaptive peak in the fitness landscape. This contrasts with previous findings of continued positive selection from long-term in vitro evolution experiments. The evolved phenotype of the infecting bacteria further suggests that the opportunistic pathogen has transitioned to become a primary pathogen for cystic fibrosis patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1018249108

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Yang, L., Jelsbak, L., Marvig, R. L., Damkiær, S., Workman, C. T., Rau, M. H., Hansen, S. K., Folkesson, A., Johansen, H. K., Ciofu, O., Høiby, N., Sommer, M. O. A., & Molin, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
108
Issue
18
Pages
7481-7486
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2015502647
Cited by
369
References
4
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in a human host environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1018249108
The paper
Yang, L., Jelsbak, L., Marvig, R. L., Damkiær, S., Workman, C. T., Rau, M. H., Hansen, S. K., Folkesson, A., Johansen, H. K., Ciofu, O., Høiby, N., Sommer, M. O. A., & Molin, S. (2011). Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in a human host environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018249108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.