The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation
Open accessAbstract
Many regulatory molecules are present in low copy numbers per cell so that significant random fluctuations emerge spontaneously. Because cell viability depends on precise regulation of key events, such signal noise has been thought to impose a threat that cells must carefully eliminate. However, the precision of control is also greatly affected by the regulatory mechanisms' capacity for sensitivity amplification. Here we show that even if signal noise reduces the capacity for sensitivity amplification of threshold mechanisms, the effect on realistic regulatory kinetics can be the opposite: stochastic focusing (SF). SF particularly exploits tails of probability distributions and can be formulated as conventional multistep sensitivity amplification where signal noise provides the degrees of freedom. When signal fluctuations are sufficiently rapid, effects of time correlations in signal-dependent rates are negligible and SF works just like conventional sensitivity amplification. This means that, quite counterintuitively, signal noise can reduce the uncertainty in regulated processes. SF is exemplified by standard hyperbolic inhibition, and all probability distributions for signal noise are first derived from underlying chemical master equations. The negative binomial is suggested as a paradigmatic distribution for intracellular kinetics, applicable to stochastic gene expression as well as simple systems with Michaelis–Menten degradation or positive feedback. SF resembles stochastic resonance in that noise facilitates signal detection in nonlinear systems, but stochastic resonance is related to how noise in threshold systems allows for detection of subthreshold signals and SF describes how fluctuations can make a gradual response mechanism work more like a threshold mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gammaitoni, L., Hänggi, P., Jung, P., & Marchesoni, F. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.223 · Cited by 5,443
Cited by
Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks
Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.151588598 · Cited by 1,428
Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level
Cai, L., Friedman, N., & Xie, X. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04599 · Cited by 1,145
Robustness of cellular functions
Stelling, J., Sauer, U., Szallasi, Z., Doyle, F. J., & Doyle, J. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008 · Cited by 1,049
Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise
Rao, C. V., Wolf, D. M., & Arkin, A. P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01258 · Cited by 1,006
Csermely, P., Palotai, R., & Nussinov, R. (2010) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.009 · Cited by 821
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulsson, J., Berg, O. G., & Ehrenberg, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-13
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7148-7153
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2165526493
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.110057697
- The paper
- Paulsson, J., Berg, O. G., & Ehrenberg, M. (2000). Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.110057697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.