The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution and structure of sustainability science
Open accessAbstract
The concepts of sustainable development have experienced extraordinary success since their advent in the 1980s. They are now an integral part of the agenda of governments and corporations, and their goals have become central to the mission of research laboratories and universities worldwide. However, it remains unclear how far the field has progressed as a scientific discipline, especially given its ambitious agenda of integrating theory, applied science, and policy, making it relevant for development globally and generating a new interdisciplinary synthesis across fields. To address these questions, we assembled a corpus of scholarly publications in the field and analyzed its temporal evolution, geographic distribution, disciplinary composition, and collaboration structure. We show that sustainability science has been growing explosively since the late 1980s when foundational publications in the field increased its pull on new authors and intensified their interactions. The field has an unusual geographic footprint combining contributions and connecting through collaboration cities and nations at very different levels of development. Its decomposition into traditional disciplines reveals its emphasis on the management of human, social, and ecological systems seen primarily from an engineering and policy perspective. Finally, we show that the integration of these perspectives has created a new field only in recent years as judged by the emergence of a giant component of scientific collaboration. These developments demonstrate the existence of a growing scientific field of sustainability science as an unusual, inclusive and ubiquitous scientific practice and bode well for its continued impact and longevity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization
Chen, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100 · Cited by 2,791
Cited by
Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes
Wu, J. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9 · Cited by 1,536
Principles for a sustainable circular economy
Velenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018 · Cited by 1,350
Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08748-210341 · Cited by 1,254
Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework
Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., Jarchow, M., et al. (2021) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2 · Cited by 928
A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-11-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 19540-19545
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2066080917
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution and structure of sustainability science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
- The paper
- Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.