Evolution of the V, D, and J gene segments used in the primate γδ T-cell receptor reveals a dichotomy of conservation and diversity
Open accessAbstract
γδ T cells are an immunological enigma in that both their function in the immune response and the molecular mechanisms behind their activation remain unclear. These cells predominate in the epithelia and can be rapidly activated to provide an array of responses. However, no homologous γδ T-cell populations have been identified between humans and mice, and our understanding of what these cells recognize as ligands is limited. Here we take an alternative approach to understanding human γδ T-cell ligand recognition by studying the evolutionary forces that have shaped the V, D, and J gene segments that are used during somatic rearrangement to generate the γδ T-cell receptor. We find that distinctly different forces have shaped the γ and δ loci. The Vδ and Jδ genes are highly conserved, some even through to mouse. In contrast, the γ-locus is split: the Vγ9, Vγ10, and Vγ11 genes represent the conserved region of the Vγ gene locus whereas the remaining Vγ genes have been evolving rapidly, such that orthology throughout the primate lineage is unclear. We have also analyzed the coding versus silent substitutions between species within the V and J gene segments and find a preference for coding substitutions in the complementarity determining region loops of many of the V gene segments. Our results provide a different perspective on investigating human γδ T-cell recognition, demonstrating that diversification at particular γδ gene loci has been favored during primate evolution, suggesting adaptation of particular V domains to a changing ligand environment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When assembling TCRs, human γδ T cells express seven bona fide Vγ genes but only three Vδ genes.
“When assembling TCRs, human γδ T cells express seven bona fide Vγ genes but only three Vδ genes (27).”
From Comparing Mouse and Human Tissue-Resident γδ T Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology
Vantourout, P., & Hayday, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3384 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Silva-Santos, B., Serre, K., & Norell, H. (2015) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3904 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Comparing Mouse and Human Tissue-Resident γδ T Cells
Qu, G., Wang, S., Zhou, Z., Jiang, D., Liao, A., & Luo, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.891687 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kazen, A. R., & Adams, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Adams, Erin J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-07-05
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- E332-40
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3141992
- OpenAlex
- W1982780950
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kinship Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI073922)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- γδ T cells, V(D)J recombination, primate evolution, hypervariable region, ligand recognition, orthology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Primates, Genetic Variation, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Alignment, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Genes, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review