The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controversies in clinical cancer dormancy
Open accessAbstract
Clinical cancer dormancy is defined as an unusually long time between removal of the primary tumor and subsequent relapse in a patient who has been clinically disease-free. The condition is frequently observed in certain carcinomas (e.g., breast cancer), B-cell lymphoma, and melanoma, with relapse occurring 5–25 y later. Clinical data suggest that a majority of breast cancer survivors have cancer cells for decades but can remain clinically cancer-free for their lifetime. Thus, there is a major effort to characterize the molecular mechanisms responsible for inducing tumor cell dormancy using experimental models or studying the early phases of cancer growth in humans. Many molecules and signaling pathways have been characterized and have led to concepts that dominate the field, such as the possible role of innate and adaptive immunity in immune surveillance and initiation and maintenance of dormancy. However, recent clinical data do not support many of these concepts. Several areas need further study to determine their relevance to clinical cancer dormancy. We suggest hypotheses that may contribute to elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the dormant state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Hodi, F. S., O'Day, S. J., McDermott, D. F., Weber, R. W., Sosman, J. A., Haanen, J. B., Gonzalez, R., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003466 · Cited by 15,155
Sipuleucel-T Immunotherapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kantoff, P. W., Higano, C. S., Shore, N. D., Berger, E. R., Small, E. J., Penson, D. F., Redfern, C. H., Ferrari, A. C., Dreicer, R., Sims, R. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1001294 · Cited by 5,572
Transcriptional switch of dormant tumors to fast-growing angiogenic phenotype
Almog, N., Ma, L., Raychowdhury, R., Schwager, C., Erber, R., Short, S., Hlatky, L., Vajkoczy, P., Huber, P. E., Folkman, J., et al. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2590 · Cited by 240
Cited by
The perivascular niche regulates breast tumour dormancy
Ghajar, C. M., Peinado, H., Mori, H., Matei, I. R., Evason, K. J., Brazier, H., Almeida, D., Koller, A., Hajjar, K. A., Stainier, D. Y. R., et al. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2767 · Cited by 1,148
To differentiate or not — routes towards metastasis
Brabletz, T. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3265 · Cited by 623
The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer
Riggio, A. I., Varley, K. E., & Welm, A. L. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4 · Cited by 616
EMT, CTCs and CSCs in tumor relapse and drug-resistance
Mitra, A., Mishra, L., & Li, S. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4037 · Cited by 465
The determinants of tumour immunogenicity
Blankenstein, T., Coulie, P. G., Gilboa, E., & Jaffee, E. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3246 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Uhr, J. W., & Pantel, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-07-11
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 12396-12400
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2028672331
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controversies in clinical cancer dormancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1106613108
- The paper
- Uhr, J. W., & Pantel, K. (2011). Controversies in clinical cancer dormancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106613108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.