The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs
Open accessAbstract
Efforts to develop a global understanding of the functioning of the Earth as a system began in the mid-1980s. This effort necessitated linking knowledge from both the physical and biological realms. A motivation for this development was the growing impact of humans on the Earth system and need to provide solutions, but the study of the social drivers and their consequences for the changes that were occurring was not incorporated into the Earth System Science movement, despite early attempts to do so. The impediments to integration were many, but they are gradually being overcome, which can be seen in many trends for assessments, such as the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as well as both basic and applied science programs. In this development, particular people and events have shaped the trajectories that have occurred. The lessons learned should be considered in such emerging research programs as Future Earth, the new global program for sustainability research. The transitioning process to this new program will take time as scientists adjust to new colleagues with different ideologies, methods, and tools and a new way of doing science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis (MPB-46)
Loreau, M. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400834167 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Systems integration for global sustainability
Liu, J., Mooney, H., Hull, V., Davis, S. J., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T., Lubchenco, J., Seto, K. C., Gleick, P., Kremen, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258832 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationEcology in an anthropogenic biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2015) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/14-2274.1 · Cited by 632
Villarrubia-Gómez, P., Cornell, S. E., & Fabres, J. (2018) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.035 · Cited by 588
Tracing the Water–Energy–Food Nexus: Description, Theory and Practice
Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M., & Rees, J. (2015) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12222 · Cited by 469
RESILIENCE THINKING: LESSONS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DUIT, A. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12182 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Mooney, H. A., Duraiappah, A., & Larigauderie, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-01-07
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- supplement_1
- Pages
- 3665-3672
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2081339803
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1107484110
- The paper
- Mooney, H. A., Duraiappah, A., & Larigauderie, A. (2013). Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107484110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.