The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic autoinoculation and the microbial ecology of a deep water hydrocarbon irruption
Open accessAbstract
The irruption of gas and oil into the Gulf of Mexico during the Deepwater Horizon event fed a deep sea bacterial bloom that consumed hydrocarbons in the affected waters, formed a regional oxygen anomaly, and altered the microbiology of the region. In this work, we develop a coupled physical–metabolic model to assess the impact of mixing processes on these deep ocean bacterial communities and their capacity for hydrocarbon and oxygen use. We find that observed biodegradation patterns are well-described by exponential growth of bacteria from seed populations present at low abundance and that current oscillation and mixing processes played a critical role in distributing hydrocarbons and associated bacterial blooms within the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Mixing processes also accelerated hydrocarbon degradation through an autoinoculation effect, where water masses, in which the hydrocarbon irruption had caused blooms, later returned to the spill site with hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria persisting at elevated abundance. Interestingly, although the initial irruption of hydrocarbons fed successive blooms of different bacterial types, subsequent irruptions promoted consistency in the structure of the bacterial community. These results highlight an impact of mixing and circulation processes on biodegradation activity of bacteria during the Deepwater Horizon event and suggest an important role for mixing processes in the microbial ecology of deep ocean environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential.
Desai, J. D., & Banat, I. M. (1997) · Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · doi:10.1128/.61.1.47-64.1997 · Cited by 2,460
Cited by
Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11550 · Cited by 5,533
Oil spill problems and sustainable response strategies through new technologies
Ivshina, I. B., Kuyukina, M. S., Krivoruchko, A. V., Elkin, A. A., Makarov, S. O., Cunningham, C. J., Peshkur, T. A., Atlas, R. M., & Philp, J. C. (2015) · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/c5em00070j · Cited by 424
Redmond, M. C., & Valentine, D. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1108756108 · Cited by 388
Self-citationDubinsky, E. A., Conrad, M. E., Chakraborty, R., Bill, M., Borglin, S. E., Hollibaugh, J. T., Mason, O. U., M. Piceno, Y., Reid, F. C., Stringfellow, W. T., et al. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401676y · Cited by 366
Using dispersants after oil spills: impacts on the composition and activity of microbial communities
Kleindienst, S., Paul, J. H., & Joye, S. B. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3452 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Valentine, D. L., Mezić, I., Maćešić, S., Črnjarić-Žic, N., Ivić, S., Hogan, P. J., Fonoberov, V. A., & Loire, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-01-10
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 20286-20291
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2049157591
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic autoinoculation and the microbial ecology of a deep water hydrocarbon irruption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1108820109
- The paper
- Valentine, D. L., Mezić, I., Maćešić, S., Črnjarić-Žic, N., Ivić, S., Hogan, P. J., Fonoberov, V. A., & Loire, S. (2012). Dynamic autoinoculation and the microbial ecology of a deep water hydrocarbon irruption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108820109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.