The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore–microtubule attachment errors
Open accessAbstract
Most solid tumors are aneuploid, and many missegregate chromosomes at high rates in a phenomenon called chromosomal instability (CIN). CIN reflects the erosion of mitotic fidelity, and it correlates with poor patient prognosis and drug resistance. The most common mechanism causing CIN is the persistence of improper kinetochore–microtubule attachments called merotely. Chromosomes with merotelic kinetochores often manifest as lagging chromosomes in anaphase, suggesting that lagging chromosomes fail to segregate properly. However, it remains unknown whether the lagging chromosomes observed in anaphase segregate to the correct or incorrect daughter cell. To address this question, we tracked the segregation of a single human chromosome during cell division by using LacI-GFP to target an integrated LacO array. By scoring the distribution of each sister chromatid during mitosis, we show that a majority of lagging chromosomes in anaphase segregate to the correct daughter cell. Instead, sister chromatids that segregate erroneously frequently do so without obvious evidence of lagging during anaphase. This outcome is expected if sister kinetochores on a chromosome bind microtubules oriented toward the same spindle pole, and we find evidence for syntelic kinetochore attachments in cells after treatments that increase missegregation rates. Thus, lagging chromosomes in anaphase are symptomatic of defects in kinetochore–microtubule attachment dynamics that cause chromosome missegregation associated with CIN, but the laggards rarely missegregate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism
Thompson, S. L., & Compton, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200905057 · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Cited by
DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis
Crasta, K., Ganem, N. J., Dagher, R., Lantermann, A. B., Ivanova, E. V., Pan, Y., Nezi, L., Protopopov, A., Chowdhury, D., & Pellman, D. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10802 · Cited by 1,227
Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei
Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J., & Hetzer, M. W. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.007 · Cited by 741
Holland, A. J., & Cleveland, D. W. (2012) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2012.55 · Cited by 288
FoxM1 repression during human aging leads to mitotic decline and aneuploidy-driven full senescence
Macedo, J. C., Vaz, S., Bakker, B., Ribeiro, R., Bakker, P. L., Escandell, J. M., Ferreira, M. G., Medema, R., Foijer, F., & Logarinho, E. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05258-6 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, S. L., & Compton, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-10-13
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 17974-17978
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2042107535
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore–microtubule attachment errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1109720108
- The paper
- Thompson, S. L., & Compton, D. A. (2011). Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore–microtubule attachment errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109720108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.