The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes
Open accessAbstract
Malaria continues to impose a substantial burden on human health. We have previously proposed that biological approaches to control the mosquito vector of disease could be developed using homing endonuclease genes (HEGs), a class of selfish or parasitic gene that exists naturally in many microbes. Recent lab studies have demonstrated that HEGs can function in mosquitoes. We constructed and analyzed a model of mosquito population genetics and malaria epidemiology to determine how well HEGs need to function in order to have a significant effect on the burden of disease. Our model, combined with currently available data, indicates that populations of Anopheles gambiae could be eliminated by releasing 2–3 HEGs targeting female fertility genes, or a driving-Y chromosome that is transmitted to 75–96% of progeny. Combinations of fertility-targeting HEGs and Y drive may also be effective. It is possible to eliminate the disease without eliminating the vector, but the parameter space producing this outcome appears to be small. HEGs causing a quantitative reduction in adult survival can be more effective than those targeting female fertility, but the selection coefficients that need to be imposed are still large, unless many HEGs are to be released. Simulations show that HEG-based strategies can be effective over socially relevant time frames. Important limiting assumptions of the models are that there is only a single vector species, and we model a homogeneous population, not a landscape. Nevertheless, we conclude that HEG-based approaches could have a transformational effect on malaria control efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations
Beverton, R. J. H., & Holt, S. J. (1958) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1440619 · Cited by 2,666
Hay, S. I., Rogers, D. J., Toomer, J. F., & Snow, R. W. (2000) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90246-3 · Cited by 312
How to make evolution-proof insecticides for malaria control
Read, A. F., Lynch, P. A., & Thomas, M. B. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000058 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem
McGraw, E. A., & O'Neill, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2968 · Cited by 381
Mosquito ecology and control of malaria
Godfray, H. C. J. (2013) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12003 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deredec, A., Godfray, H. C. J., & Burt, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-10-05
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- E874-80
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2004343469
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1110717108
- The paper
- Deredec, A., Godfray, H. C. J., & Burt, A. (2011). Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110717108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.