The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident
Open accessAbstract
The largest concern on the cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) deposition and its soil contamination due to the emission from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) showed up after a massive quake on March 11, 2011. Cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) with a half-life of 30.1 y causes the largest concerns because of its deleterious effect on agriculture and stock farming, and, thus, human life for decades. Removal of 137 Cs contaminated soils or land use limitations in areas where removal is not possible is, therefore, an urgent issue. A challenge lies in the fact that estimates of 137 Cs emissions from the Fukushima NPP are extremely uncertain, therefore, the distribution of 137 Cs in the environment is poorly constrained. Here, we estimate total 137 Cs deposition by integrating daily observations of 137 Cs deposition in each prefecture in Japan with relative deposition distribution patterns from a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, FLEXPART. We show that 137 Cs strongly contaminated the soils in large areas of eastern and northeastern Japan, whereas western Japan was sheltered by mountain ranges. The soils around Fukushima NPP and neighboring prefectures have been extensively contaminated with depositions of more than 100,000 and 10,000 MBq km -2 , respectively. Total 137 Cs depositions over two domains: ( i ) the Japan Islands and the surrounding ocean (130–150 °E and 30–46 °N) and, ( ii ) the Japan Islands, were estimated to be more than 5.6 and 1.0 PBq, respectively. We hope our 137 Cs deposition maps will help to coordinate decontamination efforts and plan regulatory measures in Japan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sources and effects of ionizing radiation
(2018) · United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Reports · doi:10.18356/f48d655d-en · Cited by 3,985
Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., & Wotawa, G. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005 · Cited by 1,947
Self-citationCHINO, M., NAKAYAMA, H., NAGAI, H., TERADA, H., KATATA, G., & YAMAZAWA, H. (2011) · Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711799 · Cited by 962
Morino, Y., Ohara, T., & Nishizawa, M. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2011gl048689 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
Optimized Phytoremediation Process for the Sustainable Management of Radionuclides
(2023) · Journal of Food Chemistry & Nanotechnology · doi:10.17756/jfcn.2023-s1-038 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Yasunari, T. J., Stohl, A., Hayano, R. S., Burkhart, J. F., Eckhardt, S., & Yasunari, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-11-14
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 19530-19534
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2013118566
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 47.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1112058108
- The paper
- Yasunari, T. J., Stohl, A., Hayano, R. S., Burkhart, J. F., Eckhardt, S., & Yasunari, T. (2011). Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112058108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.