The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaporation rate of water in hydrophobic confinement
Open accessAbstract
The drying of hydrophobic cavities is believed to play an important role in biophysical phenomena such as the folding of globular proteins, the opening and closing of ligand-gated ion channels, and ligand binding to hydrophobic pockets. We use forward flux sampling, a molecular simulation technique, to compute the rate of capillary evaporation of water confined between two hydrophobic surfaces separated by nanoscopic gaps, as a function of gap, surface size, and temperature. Over the range of conditions investigated (gaps between 9 and 14 Å and surface areas between 1 and 9 nm 2 ), the free energy barrier to evaporation scales linearly with the gap between hydrophobic surfaces, suggesting that line tension makes the predominant contribution to the free energy barrier. The exponential dependence of the evaporation rate on the gap between confining surfaces causes a 10 order-of-magnitude decrease in the rate when the gap increases from 9 to 14 Å. The computed free energy barriers are of the order of 50 kT and are predominantly enthalpic. Evaporation rates per unit area are found to be two orders of magnitude faster in confinement by the larger (9 nm 2 ) than by the smaller (1 nm 2 ) surfaces considered here, at otherwise identical conditions. We show that this rate enhancement is a consequence of the dependence of hydrophobic hydration on the size of solvated objects. For sufficiently large surfaces, the critical nucleus for the evaporation process is a gap-spanning vapor tube.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
T RANSITION P ATH S AMPLING : Throwing Ropes Over Rough Mountain Passes, in the Dark
Bolhuis, P. G., Chandler, D., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146 · Cited by 1,972
Cited by
Materials for solar-powered water evaporation
Zhao, F., Guo, Y., Zhou, X., Shi, W., & Yu, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0182-4 · Cited by 1,541
Tailoring surface wetting states for ultrafast solar-driven water evaporation
Guo, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, F., Jiao, Z., Zhou, X., & Yu, G. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee00399a · Cited by 432
Factors that Determine Zeolite Stability in Hot Liquid Water
Zhang, L., Chen, K., Chen, B., White, J. L., & Resasco, D. E. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b07398 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, S., & Debenedetti, P. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-03-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4365-4370
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056331631
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaporation rate of water in hydrophobic confinement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1116167109
- The paper
- Sharma, S., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2012). Evaporation rate of water in hydrophobic confinement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116167109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.