The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex
Open accessAbstract
As sensory stimuli and behavioral demands change, the attentive brain quickly identifies task-relevant stimuli and associates them with appropriate motor responses. The effects of attention on sensory processing vary across task paradigms, suggesting that the brain may use multiple strategies and mechanisms to highlight attended stimuli and link them to motor action. To better understand factors that contribute to these variable effects, we studied sensory representations in primary auditory cortex (A1) during two instrumental tasks that shared the same auditory discrimination but required different behavioral responses, either approach or avoidance. In the approach task, ferrets were rewarded for licking a spout when they heard a target tone amid a sequence of reference noise sounds. In the avoidance task, they were punished unless they inhibited licking to the target. To explore how these changes in task reward structure influenced attention-driven rapid plasticity in A1, we measured changes in sensory neural responses during behavior. Responses to the target changed selectively during both tasks but did so with opposite sign. Despite the differences in sign, both effects were consistent with a general neural coding strategy that maximizes discriminability between sound classes. The dependence of the direction of plasticity on task suggests that representations in A1 change not only to sharpen representations of task-relevant stimuli but also to amplify responses to stimuli that signal aversive outcomes and lead to behavioral inhibition. Thus, top-down control of sensory processing can be shaped by task reward structure in addition to the required sensory discrimination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (2003) · Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2834.003.0024 · Cited by 2,144
Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex
Treue, S., & Trujillo, J. C. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21176 · Cited by 1,465
Cortical Map Reorganization Enabled by Nucleus Basalis Activity
Kilgard, M. P., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5357.1714 · Cited by 1,195
Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex
Moore, T., & Armstrong, K. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01341 · Cited by 1,169
Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations
Cohen, M. R., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2439 · Cited by 1,152
Fundamental Components of Attention
Knudsen, E. I. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256 · Cited by 1,020
Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli
Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379449a0 · Cited by 829
Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex
Fritz, J., Shamma, S., Elhilali, M., & Klein, D. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1141 · Cited by 823
Self-citationA synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity
Froemke, R. C., Merzenich, M. M., & Schreiner, C. E. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06289 · Cited by 600
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90555-2 · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(76)90555-2
- 10.1007/s10827-009-0181-3 · doi:10.1007/s10827-009-0181-3
- 10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.539 · DOI
Cited by
Learning Enhances Sensory and Multiple Non-sensory Representations in Primary Visual Cortex
Poort, J., Khan, A. G., Pachitariu, M., Nemri, A., Orsolic, I., Krupic, J., Bauza, M., Sahani, M., Keller, G. B., Mrsic-Flogel, T. D., et al. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.037 · Cited by 403
Mechanism of increased risk of insulin resistance in aging skeletal muscle
Shou, J., Chen, P.-J., & Xiao, W.-H. (2020) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-020-0523-x · Cited by 283
Tracing the Trajectory of Sensory Plasticity across Different Stages of Speech Learning in Adulthood
Reetzke, R., Xie, Z., Llanos, F., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.026 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- David, S. V., Fritz, J. B., & Shamma, S. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-01-23
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2144-2149
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2021338128
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1117717109
- The paper
- David, S. V., Fritz, J. B., & Shamma, S. A. (2012). Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117717109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.