Cited by 276Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes

Open access
Shiroguchi, Katsuyuki, Jia, Tony Z., Sims, Peter A., Xie, X. Sunney·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful tool for transcriptome profiling, but is hampered by sequence-dependent bias and inaccuracy at low copy numbers intrinsic to exponential PCR amplification. We developed a simple strategy for mitigating these complications, allowing truly digital RNA-Seq. Following reverse transcription, a large set of barcode sequences is added in excess, and nearly every cDNA molecule is uniquely labeled by random attachment of barcode sequences to both ends. After PCR, we applied paired-end deep sequencing to read the two barcodes and cDNA sequences. Rather than counting the number of reads, RNA abundance is measured based on the number of unique barcode sequences observed for a given cDNA sequence. We optimized the barcodes to be unambiguously identifiable, even in the presence of multiple sequencing errors. This method allows counting with single-copy resolution despite sequence-dependent bias and PCR-amplification noise, and is analogous to digital PCR but amendable to quantifying a whole transcriptome. We demonstrated transcriptome profiling of Escherichia coli with more accurate and reproducible quantification than conventional RNA-Seq.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1118018109

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dropout events manifest as bimodality of gene expression with one mode at zero, and in many cases this bimodality is dominated by false negatives.

    “Across a set of cells, this manifests as bimodality of gene expression (with one mode at zero). While in some cases such bimodality is due to stochastic (‘bursty’) gene expression40 or more stable variation between cell types and states3, in many others it is dominated by false negatives70,85.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 276

Authors
Shiroguchi, K., Jia, T. Z., Sims, P. A., & Xie, X. S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-01-09
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
1347-1352
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2037780745
Cited by
276
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
  • Tufts University School of Medicine
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG005097-01, RC2HG005613, R01HG005097)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, RNA, DNA, Complementary, Gene Expression Profiling, Systems Biology, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review