Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving the efficiency of water splitting in dye-sensitized solar cells by using a biomimetic electron transfer mediator

Open access
Zhao, Yixin, Swierk, John R., Megiatto, Jackson D., Sherman, Benjamin, Youngblood, W. Justin, Qin, Dongdong, Lentz, Deanna M., Moore, Ana L., Moore, Thomas A., Gust, Devens, Mallouk, Thomas E.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Photoelectrochemical water splitting directly converts solar energy to chemical energy stored in hydrogen, a high energy density fuel. Although water splitting using semiconductor photoelectrodes has been studied for more than 40 years, it has only recently been demonstrated using dye-sensitized electrodes. The quantum yield for water splitting in these dye-based systems has, so far, been very low because the charge recombination reaction is faster than the catalytic four-electron oxidation of water to oxygen. We show here that the quantum yield is more than doubled by incorporating an electron transfer mediator that is mimetic of the tyrosine-histidine mediator in Photosystem II. The mediator molecule is covalently bound to the water oxidation catalyst, a colloidal iridium oxide particle, and is coadsorbed onto a porous titanium dioxide electrode with a Ruthenium polypyridyl sensitizer. As in the natural photosynthetic system, this molecule mediates electron transfer between a relatively slow metal oxide catalyst that oxidizes water on the millisecond timescale and a dye molecule that is oxidized in a fast light-induced electron transfer reaction. The presence of the mediator molecule in the system results in photoelectrochemical water splitting with an internal quantum efficiency of approximately 2.3% using blue light.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1118339109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., Swierk, J. R., Megiatto, J. D., Sherman, B., Youngblood, W. J., Qin, D., Lentz, D. M., Moore, A. L., Moore, T. A., Gust, D., & Mallouk, T. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
109
Issue
39
Pages
15612-15616
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2071705887
Cited by
311
References
1
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the efficiency of water splitting in dye-sensitized solar cells by using a biomimetic electron transfer mediator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1118339109
The paper
Zhao, Y., Swierk, J. R., Megiatto, J. D., Sherman, B., Youngblood, W. J., Qin, D., Lentz, D. M., Moore, A. L., Moore, T. A., Gust, D., & Mallouk, T. E. (2012). Improving the efficiency of water splitting in dye-sensitized solar cells by using a biomimetic electron transfer mediator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118339109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.