The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance
Open accessAbstract
Development of insecticide resistance has been a serious concern worldwide, whose mechanisms have been attributed to evolutionary changes in pest insect genomes such as alteration of drug target sites, up-regulation of degrading enzymes, and enhancement of drug excretion. Here, we report a previously unknown mechanism of insecticide resistance: Infection with an insecticide-degrading bacterial symbiont immediately establishes insecticide resistance in pest insects. The bean bug Riptortus pedestris and allied stinkbugs harbor mutualistic gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Burkholderia , which are acquired by nymphal insects from environmental soil every generation. In agricultural fields, fenitrothion-degrading Burkolderia strains are present at very low densities. We demonstrated that the fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia strains establish a specific and beneficial symbiosis with the stinkbugs and confer a resistance of the host insects against fenitrothion. Experimental applications of fenitrothion to field soils drastically enriched fenitrothion-degrading bacteria from undetectable levels to >80% of total culturable bacterial counts in the field soils, and >90% of stinkbugs reared with the enriched soil established symbiosis with fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia . In a Japanese island where fenitrothion has been constantly applied to sugarcane fields, we identified a stinkbug population wherein the insects live on sugarcane and ≈8% of them host fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia . Our finding suggests the possibility that the symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance may develop even in the absence of pest insects, quickly establish within a single insect generation, and potentially move around horizontally between different pest insects and other organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts.
Bright, M., & Bulgheresi, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2262 · Cited by 894 · cited 1×
“In contrast to vertical symbiont transmission ubiquitously found in many insects (14, 15), R.”
Background
Cited by
Multiorganismal Insects: Diversity and Function of Resident Microorganisms
Douglas, A. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020822 · Cited by 1,315
Nkya, T. E., Akhouayri, I., Kisinza, W., & David, J.-P. (2013) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.006 · Cited by 402
Holes in the Hologenome: Why Host-Microbe Symbioses Are Not Holobionts
Douglas, A. E., & Werren, J. H. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02099-15 · Cited by 363
Jing, T.-Z., Qi, F.-H., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00823-y · Cited by 341
Soltani, A., Vatandoost, H., Oshaghi, M. A., Enayati, A. A., & Chavshin, A. R. (2017) · Pathogens and Global Health · doi:10.1080/20477724.2017.1356052 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Kikuchi, Y., Hayatsu, M., Hosokawa, T., Nagayama, A., Tago, K., & Fukatsu, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-04-23
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8618-8622
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1974897987
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1200231109
- The paper
- Kikuchi, Y., Hayatsu, M., Hosokawa, T., Nagayama, A., Tago, K., & Fukatsu, T. (2012). Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200231109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.