Late Cretaceous restructuring of terrestrial communities facilitated the end-Cretaceous mass extinction in North America
Open accessAbstract
The sudden environmental catastrophe in the wake of the end-Cretaceous asteroid impact had drastic effects that rippled through animal communities. To explore how these effects may have been exacerbated by prior ecological changes, we used a food-web model to simulate the effects of primary productivity disruptions, such as those predicted to result from an asteroid impact, on ten Campanian and seven Maastrichtian terrestrial localities in North America. Our analysis documents that a shift in trophic structure between Campanian and Maastrichtian communities in North America led Maastrichtian communities to experience more secondary extinction at lower levels of primary production shutdown and possess a lower collapse threshold than Campanian communities. Of particular note is the fact that changes in dinosaur richness had a negative impact on the robustness of Maastrichtian ecosystems against environmental perturbations. Therefore, earlier ecological restructuring may have exacerbated the impact and severity of the end-Cretaceous extinction, at least in North America.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reconstructed fossil ecosystems (paleo food webs) share universal patterns with modern ecological networks.
“We can also reconstruct fossil ecosystems, the so-called ‘paleo food webs’ [298,299] (figure 8a,b), and again find universal patterns shared with modern ecological networks [303].”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [299]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Mitchell, J. S., Roopnarine, P. D., & Angielczyk, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Field Museum of Natural History (US)
- California Academy of Sciences (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-10-29
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 18857-18861
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3503193
- OpenAlex
- W2109274970
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- end-Cretaceous mass extinction, asteroid impact, Late Cretaceous, terrestrial food webs, trophic structure, secondary extinction, Campanian, Maastrichtian, North America
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fossils, North America, Ecosystem, Minor Planets, Dinosaurs, Extinction, Biological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review