Cited by 67Plant Molecular Biology ResearchLight effects on plantsLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

Conserved genetic determinant of motor organ identity in Medicago truncatula and related legumes

Open access
Chen, Jianghua, Moreau, Carol, Liu, Yu, Kawaguchi, Masayoshi, Hofer, Julie, Ellis, Noel, Chen, Rujin·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Plants exhibit various kinds of movements that have fascinated scientists and the public for centuries. Physiological studies in plants with the so-called motor organ or pulvinus suggest that cells at opposite sides of the pulvinus mediate leaf or leaflet movements by swelling and shrinking. How motor organ identity is determined is unknown. Using a genetic approach, we isolated a mutant designated elongated petiolule1 ( elp1 ) from Medicago truncatula that fails to fold its leaflets in the dark due to loss of motor organs. Map-based cloning indicated that ELP1 encodes a putative plant-specific LOB domain transcription factor. RNA in situ analysis revealed that ELP1 is expressed in primordial cells that give rise to the motor organ. Ectopic expression of ELP1 resulted in dwarf plants with petioles and rachises reduced in length, and the epidermal cells gained characteristics of motor organ epidermal cells. By identifying ELP1 orthologs from other legume species, namely pea ( Pisum sativum ) and Lotus japonicus , we show that this motor organ identity is regulated by a conserved molecular mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1204566109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Moreau, C., Liu, Y., Kawaguchi, M., Hofer, J., Ellis, N., & Chen, R.
Affiliations
  • Noble Research Institute (US)
  • John Innes Centre (GB)
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-06-11
Volume
109
Issue
29
Pages
11723-11728
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2077883105
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0703285)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation
  • University of Oklahoma
  • European Commission
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24247013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Keywords
pulvinus, ELP1, Medicago truncatula, Fabaceae, positional cloning, orthologs, Pisum sativum, Lotus japonicus, plant movement, epidermal cells
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Cloning, Molecular, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Molecular Sequence Data, Movement, Species Specificity, Transcription Factors, Genes, Plant, In Situ Hybridization, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Complementary, Pulvinus, Medicago truncatula, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review