Cited by 570Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsNuclear Structure and Function

Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model

Open access
Barbieri, Mariano, Chotalia, Mita, Fraser, James, Lavitas, Liron-Mark, Dostie, Josée, Pombo, Ana, Nicodemi, Mario·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Chromatin has a complex spatial organization in the cell nucleus that serves vital functional purposes. A variety of chromatin folding conformations has been detected by single-cell imaging and chromosome conformation capture-based approaches. However, a unified quantitative framework describing spatial chromatin organization is still lacking. Here, we explore the “strings and binders switch” model to explain the origin and variety of chromatin behaviors that coexist and dynamically change within living cells. This simple polymer model recapitulates the scaling properties of chromatin folding reported experimentally in different cellular systems, the fractal state of chromatin, the processes of domain formation, and looping out. Additionally, the strings and binders switch model reproduces the recently proposed “fractal–globule” model, but only as one of many possible transient conformations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1204799109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chromosomal contacts follow the law of constrained Brownian motion, with contact probabilities showing a strong power-law dependence on linear genomic distance.

    “Chromosomal contacts follow the law of constrained Brownian motion (reviewed in [465]), with the contact probabilities showing a strong power–law dependence on the “linear” genomic distance [272, 466].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbieri, M., Chotalia, M., Fraser, J., Lavitas, L.-M., Dostie, J., Pombo, A., & Nicodemi, M.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli (IT)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-09-17
Volume
109
Issue
40
Pages
16173-16178
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2098497185
Cited by
570
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (86716_1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
chromatin folding, nuclear organization, polymer models, chromatin looping, scaling behavior
MeSH terms
Chromatin, Computer Simulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Chemical, Monte Carlo Method, Genome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review