The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vivo requirement for RecJ, ExoVII, ExoI, and ExoX in methyl-directed mismatch repair
Open accessAbstract
Biochemical studies with model DNA heteroduplexes have implicated RecJ exonuclease, exonuclease VII, exonuclease I, and exonuclease X in Escherichia coli methyl-directed mismatch correction. However, strains deficient in the four exonucleases display only a modest increase in mutation rate, raising questions concerning involvement of these activities in mismatch repair in vivo . The quadruple mutant deficient in the four exonucleases, as well as the triple mutant deficient in RecJ exonuclease, exonuclease VII, and exonuclease I, grow poorly in the presence of the base analogue 2-aminopurine, and exposure to the base analogue results in filament formation, indicative of induction of SOS DNA damage response. The growth defect and filamentation phenotypes associated with 2-aminopurine exposure are effectively suppressed by null mutations in mutH , mutL , mutS , or uvrD/mutU , which encode activities that act upstream of the four exonucleases in the mechanism for the methyl-directed reaction that has been proposed based on in vitro studies. The quadruple exonuclease mutant is also cold-sensitive, having a severe growth defect at 30°C. This phenotype is suppressed by a uvrD/mutU defect, and partially suppressed by mutH , mutL , or mutS mutations. These observations confirm involvement of the four exonucleases in methyl-directed mismatch repair in vivo and suggest that the low mutability of exonuclease-deficient strains is a consequence of under recovery of mutants due to a reduction in viability and/or chromosome loss associated with activation of the mismatch repair system in the absence of RecJ exonuclease, exonuclease VII, exonuclease I, and exonuclease X.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kunkel, T. A., & Erie, D. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243 · Cited by 1,367
DNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V., & Modrich, P. L. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0404794 · Cited by 905
Self-citationSSB as an Organizer/Mobilizer of Genome Maintenance Complexes
Shereda, R. D., Kozlov, A. G., Lohman, T. M., Cox, M. M., & Keck, J. L. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230802341296 · Cited by 553
N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA–protein interactions
Wion, D., & Casadesús, J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1350 · Cited by 526
Wei, K., Clark, A. B., Wong, E., Kane, M. F., Mazur, D. J., Parris, T., Kolas, N. K., Russell, R., Hou, H., Kneitz, B., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1060603 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Burdett, V., Baitinger, C., Viswanathan, M., Lovett, S. T., & Modrich, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-05-29
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6765-6770
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1976713597
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo requirement for RecJ, ExoVII, ExoI, and ExoX in methyl-directed mismatch repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.121183298
- The paper
- Burdett, V., Baitinger, C., Viswanathan, M., Lovett, S. T., & Modrich, P. (2001). In vivo requirement for RecJ, ExoVII, ExoI, and ExoX in methyl-directed mismatch repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121183298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.