The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observability of complex systems
Open accessAbstract
A quantitative description of a complex system is inherently limited by our ability to estimate the system’s internal state from experimentally accessible outputs. Although the simultaneous measurement of all internal variables, like all metabolite concentrations in a cell, offers a complete description of a system’s state, in practice experimental access is limited to only a subset of variables, or sensors. A system is called observable if we can reconstruct the system’s complete internal state from its outputs. Here, we adopt a graphical approach derived from the dynamical laws that govern a system to determine the sensors that are necessary to reconstruct the full internal state of a complex system. We apply this approach to biochemical reaction systems, finding that the identified sensors are not only necessary but also sufficient for observability. The developed approach can also identify the optimal sensors for target or partial observability, helping us reconstruct selected state variables from appropriately chosen outputs, a prerequisite for optimal biomarker design. Given the fundamental role observability plays in complex systems, these results offer avenues to systematically explore the dynamics of a wide range of natural, technological and socioeconomic systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease
Barabási, A.-L., Gulbahce, N., & Loscalzo, J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2918 · Cited by 5,034
Self-citationIdentifiability and observability analysis for experimental design in nonlinear dynamical models
Raue, A., Becker, V., Klingmüller, U., & Timmer, J. (2010) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.3528102 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Controllability Metrics, Limitations and Algorithms for Complex Networks
Pasqualetti, F., Zampieri, S., & Bullo, F. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · doi:10.1109/tcns.2014.2310254 · Cited by 594
Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures
Zio, E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009 · Cited by 429
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Spectrum of controlling and observing complex networks
Yan, G., Tsekenis, G., Barzel, B., Slotine, J.-J., Liu, Y.-Y., & Barabási, A.-L. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3422 · Cited by 279
Self-citationLahtvee, P.-J., Sánchez, B. J., Smialowska, A., Kasvandik, S., Elsemman, I. E., Gatto, F., & Nielsen, J. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.03.003 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., & Barabási, A.-L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-01-28
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2460-2465
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1981192414
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observability of complex systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1215508110
- The paper
- Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., & Barabási, A.-L. (2013). Observability of complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215508110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.