Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition as a pathogenic mechanism in Parkinson disease

Open access
Fitzmaurice, Arthur G., Rhodes, Shannon L., Lulla, Aaron, Murphy, Niall P., Lam, Hoa A., O’Donnell, Kelley C., Barnhill, Lisa, Casida, John E., Cockburn, Myles, Sagasti, Alvaro, Stahl, Mark C., Maidment, Nigel T., Ritz, Beate, Bronstein, Jeff M.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Parkinson disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder particularly characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra . Pesticide exposure has been associated with PD occurrence, and we previously reported that the fungicide benomyl interferes with several cellular processes potentially relevant to PD pathogenesis. Here we propose that benomyl, via its bioactivated thiocarbamate sulfoxide metabolite, inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), leading to accumulation of the reactive dopamine metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL), preferential degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, and development of PD. This hypothesis is supported by multiple lines of evidence. ( i ) We previously showed in mice the metabolism of benomyl to S -methyl N -butylthiocarbamate sulfoxide, which inhibits ALDH at nanomolar levels. We report here that benomyl exposure in primary mesencephalic neurons ( ii ) inhibits ALDH and ( iii ) alters dopamine homeostasis. It induces selective dopaminergic neuronal damage ( iv ) in vitro in primary mesencephalic cultures and ( v ) in vivo in a zebrafish system. ( vi ) In vitro cell loss was attenuated by reducing DOPAL formation. ( vii ) In our epidemiology study, higher exposure to benomyl was associated with increased PD risk. This ALDH model for PD etiology may help explain the selective vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons in PD and provide a potential mechanism through which environmental toxicants contribute to PD pathogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1220399110

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Fitzmaurice, A. G., Rhodes, S. L., Lulla, A., Murphy, N. P., Lam, H. A., O’Donnell, K. C., Barnhill, L., Casida, J. E., Cockburn, M., Sagasti, A., Stahl, M. C., Maidment, N. T., Ritz, B., & Bronstein, J. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-12-24
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
636-641
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2144217997
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition as a pathogenic mechanism in Parkinson disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1220399110
The paper
Fitzmaurice, A. G., Rhodes, S. L., Lulla, A., Murphy, N. P., Lam, H. A., O’Donnell, K. C., Barnhill, L., Casida, J. E., Cockburn, M., Sagasti, A., Stahl, M. C., Maidment, N. T., Ritz, B., & Bronstein, J. M. (2013). Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition as a pathogenic mechanism in Parkinson disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220399110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.