The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities
Open accessAbstract
The Amazon rainforest is the Earth’s largest reservoir of plant and animal diversity, and it has been subjected to especially high rates of land use change, primarily to cattle pasture. This conversion has had a strongly negative effect on biological diversity, reducing the number of plant and animal species and homogenizing communities. We report here that microbial biodiversity also responds strongly to conversion of the Amazon rainforest, but in a manner different from plants and animals. Local taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of soil bacteria increases after conversion, but communities become more similar across space. This homogenization is driven by the loss of forest soil bacteria with restricted ranges (endemics) and results in a net loss of diversity. This study shows homogenization of microbial communities in response to human activities. Given that soil microbes represent the majority of biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems and are intimately involved in ecosystem functions, we argue that microbial biodiversity loss should be taken into account when assessing the impact of land use change in tropical forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation?
Srivastava, D. S., & Vellend, M. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636 · Cited by 712
Cited by
How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation?
Socolar, J. B., Gilroy, J. J., Kunin, W. E., & Edwards, D. P. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005 · Cited by 1,414
Where less may be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings
Jousset, A., Bienhold, C., Chatzinotas, A., Gallien, L., Gobet, A., Kurm, V., Küsel, K., Rillig, M. C., Rivett, D. W., Salles, J. F., et al. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.174 · Cited by 1,359
Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere
Mendes, L. W., Kuramae, E. E., Navarrete, A. A., van Veen, J. A., & Tsai, S. M. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.17 · Cited by 784
Self-citationImpact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions
Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E., Mendes, R., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7 · Cited by 732
β-Diversity, Community Assembly, and Ecosystem Functioning
Mori, A. S., Isbell, F., & Seidl, R. (2018) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.012 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodrigues, J. L. M., Pellizari, V. H., Mueller, R., Baek, K., Jesus, E. D. C., Paula, F. S., Mirza, B., Hamaoui, G. S., Tsai, S. M., Feigl, B., Tiedje, J. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., & Nüsslein, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-12-27
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 988-993
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2156614819
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1220608110
- The paper
- Rodrigues, J. L. M., Pellizari, V. H., Mueller, R., Baek, K., Jesus, E. D. C., Paula, F. S., Mirza, B., Hamaoui, G. S., Tsai, S. M., Feigl, B., Tiedje, J. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., & Nüsslein, K. (2013). Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220608110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.