Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities

Open access
Rodrigues, Jorge L. M., Pellizari, Vivian H., Mueller, Rebecca, Baek, Kyunghwa, Jesus, Ederson da C., Paula, Fabiana S., Mirza, Babur, Hamaoui, George S., Tsai, Siu Mui, Feigl, Brigitte, Tiedje, James M., Bohannan, Brendan J. M., Nüsslein, Klaus·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Amazon rainforest is the Earth’s largest reservoir of plant and animal diversity, and it has been subjected to especially high rates of land use change, primarily to cattle pasture. This conversion has had a strongly negative effect on biological diversity, reducing the number of plant and animal species and homogenizing communities. We report here that microbial biodiversity also responds strongly to conversion of the Amazon rainforest, but in a manner different from plants and animals. Local taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of soil bacteria increases after conversion, but communities become more similar across space. This homogenization is driven by the loss of forest soil bacteria with restricted ranges (endemics) and results in a net loss of diversity. This study shows homogenization of microbial communities in response to human activities. Given that soil microbes represent the majority of biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems and are intimately involved in ecosystem functions, we argue that microbial biodiversity loss should be taken into account when assessing the impact of land use change in tropical forests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1220608110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, J. L. M., Pellizari, V. H., Mueller, R., Baek, K., Jesus, E. D. C., Paula, F. S., Mirza, B., Hamaoui, G. S., Tsai, S. M., Feigl, B., Tiedje, J. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., & Nüsslein, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
988-993
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2156614819
Cited by
612
References
2
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1220608110
The paper
Rodrigues, J. L. M., Pellizari, V. H., Mueller, R., Baek, K., Jesus, E. D. C., Paula, F. S., Mirza, B., Hamaoui, G. S., Tsai, S. M., Feigl, B., Tiedje, J. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., & Nüsslein, K. (2013). Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220608110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.