The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity
Open accessAbstract
Learning actors' leverage for change along the journey to sustainability requires quantifying the component forces of environmental impact and integrating them. Population, income, consumers' behavior, and producers' efficiency jointly force impact. Here, we renovate the “IPAT Identity” to identify actors with the forces. Forcing impact I are P for population, A for income as gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, C for intensity of use as a good per GDP, and T for efficiency ratios as impact per good. In the “ImPACT Identity,” parents modify P, workers modify A, consumers modify C, and producers modify T. Because annual percentage changes in component forces add to a change in national impact, actors' leverage is reflected transparently in consistent units of annual percentage changes that can be compared from force to force. Examples from energy and food, farming and manufacturing, and steel and water show that declining C, called dematerialization, can temper the sustainability challenge of growth (P × A), and that innovation or efficient technology that lowers T can counter rising consumption (P × A × C). Income elasticity can accommodate connections between income and other forces. From rates of change of forces, the identity can forecast impacts. Alternatively, by identifying the necessary change in forces to cause a projected impact, ImPACT can assay the likelihood and practicability of environmental targets and timetables. An annual 2–3% progress in consumption and technology over many decades and sectors provides a benchmark for sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00188-5 · Cited by 2,388
The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104 · Cited by 2,216
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064 · Cited by 1,127
Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms
Peattie, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328 · Cited by 964
Poizot, P., & Dolhem, F. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00731e · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Waggoner, P. E., & Ausubel, J. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-06-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7860-7865
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2147027348
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.122235999
- The paper
- Waggoner, P. E., & Ausubel, J. H. (2002). A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122235999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.