The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate that two rhodopsins, identified from cDNA sequences, function as low- and high-light-intensity phototaxis receptors in the eukaryotic alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . Each of the receptors consists of an ≈300-residue seven-transmembrane helix domain with a retinal-binding pocket homologous to that of archaeal rhodopsins, followed by ≈400 residues of additional membrane-associated portion. The function of the two rhodopsins, Chlamydomonas sensory rhodopsins A and B (CSRA and CSRB), as phototaxis receptors is demonstrated by in vivo analysis of photoreceptor electrical currents and motility responses in transformants with RNA interference (RNA i ) directed against each of the rhodopsin genes. The kinetics, fluence dependencies, and action spectra of the photoreceptor currents differ greatly in transformants in accord with the relative amounts of photoreceptor pigments expressed. The data show that CSRA has an absorption maximum near 510 nm and mediates a fast photoreceptor current that saturates at high light intensity. In contrast, CSRB absorbs maximally at 470 nm and generates a slow photoreceptor current saturating at low light intensity. The relative wavelength dependence of CSRA and CSRB activity in producing phototaxis responses matches precisely the wavelength dependence of the CSRA- and CSRB-generated currents, demonstrating that each receptor mediates phototaxis. The saturation of the two photoreceptor currents at different light fluence levels extends the range of light intensity to which the organism can respond. Further, at intensities where both operate, their light signals are integrated at the level of membrane depolarization caused by the two photoreceptor currents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity
Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., & Deisseroth, K. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1525 · Cited by 4,861
Sensing and Responding to Excess Light
Li, Z., Wakao, S., Fischer, B. B., & Niyogi, K. K. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103844 · Cited by 992
Li, J. B., Gerdes, J. M., Haycraft, C. J., Fan, Y., Teslovich, T. M., May-Simera, H., Li, H., Blacque, O. E., Li, L., Leitch, C. C., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00450-7 · Cited by 760
Structure and function of plant photoreceptors
Möglich, A., Yang, X., Ayers, R. A., & Moffat, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112259 · Cited by 499
Ishizuka, T., Kakuda, M., Araki, R., & Yawo, H. (2006) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2005.10.009 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Sineshchekov, O. A., Jung, K.-H., & Spudich, J. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-06-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 8689-8694
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2074490675
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.122243399
- The paper
- Sineshchekov, O. A., Jung, K.-H., & Spudich, J. L. (2002). Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122243399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.