The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tertiary model of a plant cellulose synthase
Open accessAbstract
A 3D atomistic model of a plant cellulose synthase (CESA) has remained elusive despite over forty years of experimental effort. Here, we report a computationally predicted 3D structure of 506 amino acids of cotton CESA within the cytosolic region. Comparison of the predicted plant CESA structure with the solved structure of a bacterial cellulose-synthesizing protein validates the overall fold of the modeled glycosyltransferase (GT) domain. The coaligned plant and bacterial GT domains share a six-stranded β-sheet, five α-helices, and conserved motifs similar to those required for catalysis in other GT-2 glycosyltransferases. Extending beyond the cross-kingdom similarities related to cellulose polymerization, the predicted structure of cotton CESA reveals that plant-specific modules (plant-conserved region and class-specific region) fold into distinct subdomains on the periphery of the catalytic region. Computational results support the importance of the plant-conserved region and/or class-specific region in CESA oligomerization to form the multimeric cellulose–synthesis complexes that are characteristic of plants. Relatively high sequence conservation between plant CESAs allowed mapping of known mutations and two previously undescribed mutations that perturb cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana to their analogous positions in the modeled structure. Most of these mutation sites are near the predicted catalytic region, and the confluence of other mutation sites supports the existence of previously undefined functional nodes within the catalytic core of CESA. Overall, the predicted tertiary structure provides a platform for the biochemical engineering of plant CESAs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
The Cell Biology of Cellulose Synthesis
McFarlane, H. E., Döring, A., & Persson, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040240 · Cited by 623
A Molecular Description of Cellulose Biosynthesis
McNamara, J. T., Morgan, J. L. W., & Zimmer, J. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930 · Cited by 382
Self-citationSecondary cell wall biosynthesis
Zhong, R., Cui, D., & Ye, Z. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15537 · Cited by 373
Molecular-level driving forces in lignocellulosic biomass deconstruction for bioenergy
Petridis, L., & Smith, J. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0050-6 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Sethaphong, L., Haigler, C. H., Kubicki, J. D., Zimmer, J., Bonetta, D., DeBolt, S., & Yingling, Y. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-04-16
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7512-7517
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046327981
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tertiary model of a plant cellulose synthase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1301027110
- The paper
- Sethaphong, L., Haigler, C. H., Kubicki, J. D., Zimmer, J., Bonetta, D., DeBolt, S., & Yingling, Y. G. (2013). Tertiary model of a plant cellulose synthase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301027110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.