The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chimera states in mechanical oscillator networks
Open accessAbstract
The synchronization of coupled oscillators is a fascinating manifestation of self-organization that nature uses to orchestrate essential processes of life, such as the beating of the heart. Although it was long thought that synchrony and disorder were mutually exclusive steady states for a network of identical oscillators, numerous theoretical studies in recent years have revealed the intriguing possibility of “chimera states,” in which the symmetry of the oscillator population is broken into a synchronous part and an asynchronous part. However, a striking lack of empirical evidence raises the question of whether chimeras are indeed characteristic of natural systems. This calls for a palpable realization of chimera states without any fine-tuning, from which physical mechanisms underlying their emergence can be uncovered. Here, we devise a simple experiment with mechanical oscillators coupled in a hierarchical network to show that chimeras emerge naturally from a competition between two antagonistic synchronization patterns. We identify a wide spectrum of complex states, encompassing and extending the set of previously described chimeras. Our mathematical model shows that the self-organization observed in our experiments is controlled by elementary dynamical equations from mechanics that are ubiquitous in many natural and technological systems. The symmetry-breaking mechanism revealed by our experiments may thus be prevalent in systems exhibiting collective behavior, such as power grids, optomechanical crystals, or cells communicating via quorum sensing in microbial populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
Chimera states: coexistence of coherence and incoherence in networks of coupled oscillators
Panaggio, M. J., & Abrams, D. M. (2015) · Nonlinearity · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/28/3/r67 · Cited by 788
Explosive transitions in complex networks’ structure and dynamics: Percolation and synchronization
Boccaletti, S., Almendral, J. A., Guan, S., Leyva, I., Liu, Z., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zou, Y. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.004 · Cited by 363
Parastesh, F., Jafari, S., Azarnoush, H., Shahriari, Z., Wang, Z., Boccaletti, S., & Perc, M. (2021) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.003 · Cited by 291
Huygens synchronization of two clocks
Oliveira, H. M., & Melo, L. V. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11548 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Martens, E. A., Thutupalli, S., Fourrière, A., & Hallatschek, O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-06-12
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10563-10567
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2105763846
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 74.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chimera states in mechanical oscillator networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1302880110
- The paper
- Martens, E. A., Thutupalli, S., Fourrière, A., & Hallatschek, O. (2013). Chimera states in mechanical oscillator networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302880110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.