Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unexpectedly high indoor hydroxyl radical concentrations associated with nitrous acid

Open access
Gómez Alvarez, Elena, Amedro, Damien, Afif, Charbel, Gligorovski, Sasho, Schoemaecker, Coralie, Fittschen, Christa, Doussin, Jean-Francois, Wortham, Henri·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The hydroxyl (OH) radical is the most important oxidant in the atmosphere since it controls its self-oxidizing capacity. The main sources of OH radicals are the photolysis of ozone and the photolysis of nitrous acid (HONO). Due to the attenuation of solar radiation in the indoor environment, the possibility of OH formation through photolytic pathways indoors has been ignored up to now. In the indoor air, the ozonolysis of alkenes has been suggested as an alternative route of OH formation. Models and indirect measurements performed up to now according to this hypothesis suggest concentrations of OH radicals on the order of 10 4 –10 5 molecules per cubic centimeter. Here, we present direct measurements of significant amounts of OH radicals of up to 1.8⋅10 6 molecules per cubic centimeter during an experimental campaign carried out in a school classroom in Marseille. This concentration is on the same order of magnitude of outdoor OH levels in the urban scenario. We also show that photolysis of HONO is an important source of OH radicals indoors under certain conditions (i.e., direct solar irradiation inside the room). Additionally, the OH concentrations were found to follow a linear dependence with the product J(HONO)⋅[HONO]. This was also supported by using a simple quasiphotostationary state model on the OH radical budget. These findings force a change in our understanding of indoor air quality because the reactivity linked to OH would involve formation of secondary species through chemical reactions that are potentially more hazardous than the primary pollutants in the indoor air.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1308310110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Gómez Alvarez, E., Amedro, D., Afif, C., Gligorovski, S., Schoemaecker, C., Fittschen, C., Doussin, J.-F., & Wortham, H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
110
Issue
33
Pages
13294-13299
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2129171973
Cited by
228
References
2
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unexpectedly high indoor hydroxyl radical concentrations associated with nitrous acid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1308310110
The paper
Gómez Alvarez, E., Amedro, D., Afif, C., Gligorovski, S., Schoemaecker, C., Fittschen, C., Doussin, J.-F., & Wortham, H. (2013). Unexpectedly high indoor hydroxyl radical concentrations associated with nitrous acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308310110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.