Cited by 192Ion channel regulation and functionNeural dynamics and brain functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Correlations in ion channel expression emerge from homeostatic tuning rules

Open access
O'Leary, Timothy, Williams, Alex H., Caplan, Jonathan S., Marder, Eve·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: A deep puzzle in neuroscience is how neurons maintain their electrical properties despite continuous ion channel turnover and activity perturbations. Previous work proposed that activity-dependent homeostatic rules ensure robust development of excitability by regulating channel density, although it is not understood how these rules shape the distribution of ion channel types nor how finely tuned these rules must be. We show that generic homeostatic regulation rules impose correlations in the steady-state distribution of ion channels, as has been recently observed experimentally. Specific correlations depend on relative expression rates, and the regulation rules themselves are far more robust than previously thought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1309966110

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is common for investigators to look for correlations between the expression of individual components or features to obtain insight into how individual system components contribute to system behavior.

    “It is common for investigators to look for correlations between the expression of individual components or features to obtain insight into how individual system components contribute to system behavior [26,[60][61][62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Bean BP (2007) The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(6):451-465.
  2. Herrera-Valdez MA, et al. (2012) Relating ion channel expression, bifurcation struc- ture, and diverse firing patterns in a model of an identified motor neuron. J Comput Neurosci 34(2):211-229.
  3. Marder E, Goaillard JM (2006) Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(7):563-574.
  4. Olypher AV, Calabrese RL (2007) Using constraints on neuronal activity to reveal compensatory changes in neuronal parameters. J Neurophysiol 98(6):3749-3758.
  5. Marder E, Prinz AA (2002) Modeling stability in neuron and network function: The role of activity in homeostasis. Bioessays 24(12):1145-1154.
  6. Turrigiano G (2007) Homeostatic signaling: The positive side of negative feedback. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17(3):318-324.
  7. Desai NS, Rutherford LC, Turrigiano GG (1999) Plasticity in the intrinsic excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci 2(6):515-520.
  8. LeMasson G, Marder E, Abbott LF (1993) Activity-dependent regulation of conductances in model neurons. Science 259(5103):1915-1917.
  9. Liu Z, Golowasch J, Marder E, Abbott LF (1998) A model neuron with activity- dependent conductances regulated by multiple calcium sensors. J Neurosci 18(7): 2309-2320.
  10. Ramakers GJ, Corner MA, Habets AM (1990) Development in the absence of spontaneous bioelectric activity results in increased stereotyped burst firing in cultures of dissociated cerebral cortex. Exp Brain Res 79(1):157-166.
  11. Seeburg DP, Sheng M (2008) Activity-induced Polo-like kinase 2 is required for homeostatic plasticity of hippocampal neurons during epileptiform activity. J Neurosci 28(26):6583-6591.
  12. Stemmler M, Koch C (1999) How voltage-dependent conductances can adapt to maximize the information encoded by neuronal firing rate. Nat Neurosci 2(6): 521-527.
  13. Triesch J (2005) A gradient rule for the plasticity of a neuron's intrinsic excitability. Artificial Neural Networks: Biological Inspirations -ICANN 2005 (Conference Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Warsaw, Poland) Proceedings Pt 1(3696):65-70.
  14. Turrigiano G, Abbott LF, Marder E (1994) Activity-dependent changes in the intrinsic properties of cultured neurons. Science 264(5161):974-977.
  15. van Welie I, van Hooft JA, Wadman WJ (2004) Homeostatic scaling of neuronal excitability by synaptic modulation of somatic hyperpolarization-activated Ih channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(14):5123-5128.
  16. Wierenga CJ, Walsh MF, Turrigiano GG (2006) Temporal regulation of the expression locus of homeostatic plasticity. J Neurophysiol 96(4):2127-2133.
  17. Wheeler DG, et al. (2012) Ca(V)1 and Ca(V)2 channels engage distinct modes of Ca(2+) signaling to control CREB-dependent gene expression. Cell 149(5):1112-1124.
  18. Desarmenien MG, Spitzer NC (1991) Role of calcium and protein kinase C in development of the delayed rectifier potassium current in Xenopus spinal neurons. Neuron 7(5):797-805.
  19. Pratt KG, Aizenman CD (2007) Homeostatic regulation of intrinsic excitability and synaptic transmission in a developing visual circuit. J Neurosci 27(31):8268-8277.
  20. Mee CJ, Pym EC, Moffat KG, Baines RA (2004) Regulation of neuronal excitability through pumilio-dependent control of a sodium channel gene. J Neurosci 24(40): 8695-8703.
  21. Siegel M, Marder E, Abbott LF (1994) Activity-dependent current distributions in model neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(24):11308-11312.
  22. Schulz DJ, Goaillard JM, Marder E (2006) Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals. Nat Neurosci 9(3):356-362.
  23. Schulz DJ, Goaillard JM, Marder EE (2007) Quantitative expression profiling of identified neurons reveals cell-specific constraints on highly variable levels of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(32):13187-13191.
  24. Swensen AM, Bean BP (2005) Robustness of burst firing in dissociated purkinje neurons with acute or long-term reductions in sodium conductance. J Neurosci 25(14):3509-3520.
  25. Temporal S, et al. (2012) Neuromodulation independently determines correlated channel expression and conductance levels in motor neurons of the stomatogastric ganglion. J Neurophysiol 107(2):718-727.
  26. Tobin AE, Cruz-Bermúdez ND, Marder E, Schulz DJ (2009) Correlations in ion channel mRNA in rhythmically active neurons. PLoS ONE 4(8):e6742.
  27. Toledo-Rodriguez M, et al. (2004) Correlation maps allow neuronal electrical proper- ties to be predicted from single-cell gene expression profiles in rat neocortex. Cereb Cortex 14(12):1310-1327.
  28. Liss B, et al. (2001) Tuning pacemaker frequency of individual dopaminergic neurons by Kv4.3L and KChip3.1 transcription. EMBO J 20(20):5715-5724.
  29. Veys K, Labro AJ, De Schutter E, Snyders DJ (2012) Quantitative single-cell ion-channel gene expression profiling through an improved qRT-PCR technique combined with whole cell patch clamp. J Neurosci Methods 209(1):227-234.
  30. Soto-Treviño C, Thoroughman KA, Marder E, Abbott LF (2001) Activity-dependent modification of inhibitory synapses in models of rhythmic neural networks. Nat Neurosci 4(3):297-303.
  31. Desai NS (2003) Homeostatic plasticity in the CNS: Synaptic and intrinsic forms. J Physiol Paris 97(4-6):391-402.
  32. Turrigiano GG (1999) Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Neurosci 22(5):221-227.
  33. Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB (2004) Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(2):97-107.
  34. Aizenman CD, Huang EJ, Linden DJ (2003) Morphological correlates of intrinsic electrical excitability in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. J Neurophysiol 89(4): 1738-1747.
  35. Prinz AA, Billimoria CP, Marder E (2003) Alternative to hand-tuning conductance- based models: Construction and analysis of databases of model neurons. J Neurophysiol 90(6):3998-4015.
  36. Prinz AA, Bucher D, Marder E (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 7(12):1345-1352.
  37. Taylor AL, Hickey TJ, Prinz AA, Marder E (2006) Structure and visualization of high- dimensional conductance spaces. J Neurophysiol 96(2):891-905.
  38. Spitzer NC (1991) A developmental handshake: Neuronal control of ionic currents and their control of neuronal differentiation. J Neurobiol 22(7):659-673.
  39. Weston AJ, Baines RA (2007) Translational regulation of neuronal electrical properties. Invert Neurosci 7(2):75-86.
  40. Grubb MS, Burrone J (2010) Activity-dependent relocation of the axon initial segment fine-tunes neuronal excitability. Nature 465(7301):1070-1074.
  41. Edelman GM, Gally JA (2001) Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(24):13763-13768.
  42. Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman GM (1999) Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(6):3257-3262.
  43. Goldman MS, Golowasch J, Marder E, Abbott LF (2001) Global structure, robustness, and modulation of neuronal models. J Neurosci 21(14):5229-5238.
  44. Hudson AE, Prinz AA (2010) Conductance ratios and cellular identity. PLOS Comput Biol 6(7):e1000838.
  45. Khazen G, Hill SL, Schürmann F, Markram H (2012) Combinatorial expression rules of ion channel genes in juvenile rat (Rattus norvegicus) neocortical neurons. PLoS ONE 7(4):e34786.
  46. Amendola J, Woodhouse A, Martin-Eauclaire MF, Goaillard JM (2012) Ca²⁺/cAMP- sensitive covariation of I(A) and I(H) voltage dependences tunes rebound firing in dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci 32(6):2166-2181.
  47. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1983) Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (Springer, New York).

Authors
O'Leary, T., Williams, A. H., Caplan, J. S., & Marder, E.
Affiliations
  • Volen Center for Complex Systems, Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454
  • Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-24
Volume
110
Issue
28
Pages
E2645-54
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1973517385
Cited by
192
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH 46742)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH019929, MH 46742, R37MH046742, R01MH046742)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T90DA032435)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
ion channel expression, homeostatic regulation, neural variability, degeneracy, neuronal electrical properties
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Homeostasis, Ion Channels, Models, Biological, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review