Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system

Open access
Vonk, Freek J., Casewell, Nicholas R., Henkel, Christiaan V., Heimberg, Alysha M., Jansen, Hans J., McCleary, Ryan J. R., Kerkkamp, Harald M. E., Vos, Rutger A., Guerreiro, Isabel, Calvete, Juan J., Wüster, Wolfgang, Woods, Anthony E., Logan, Jessica M., Harrison, Robert A., Castoe, Todd A., de Koning, A. P. Jason, Pollock, David D., Yandell, Mark, Calderon, Diego, Renjifo, Camila, Currier, Rachel B., Salgado, David, Pla, Davinia, Sanz, Libia, Hyder, Asad S., Ribeiro, José M. C., Arntzen, Jan W., van den Thillart, Guido E. E. J. M., Boetzer, Marten, Pirovano, Walter, Dirks, Ron P., Spaink, Herman P., Duboule, Denis, McGlinn, Edwina, Kini, R. Manjunatha, Richardson, Michael K.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Snake venoms are toxic protein cocktails used for prey capture. To investigate the evolution of these complex biological weapon systems, we sequenced the genome of a venomous snake, the king cobra, and assessed the composition of venom gland expressed genes, small RNAs, and secreted venom proteins. We show that regulatory components of the venom secretory system may have evolved from a pancreatic origin and that venom toxin genes were co-opted by distinct genomic mechanisms. After co-option, toxin genes important for prey capture have massively expanded by gene duplication and evolved under positive selection, resulting in protein neofunctionalization. This diverse and dramatic venom-related genomic response seemingly occurs in response to a coevolutionary arms race between venomous snakes and their prey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1314702110

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Vonk, F. J., Casewell, N. R., Henkel, C. V., Heimberg, A. M., Jansen, H. J., McCleary, R. J. R., Kerkkamp, H. M. E., Vos, R. A., Guerreiro, I., Calvete, J. J., Wüster, W., Woods, A. E., Logan, J. M., Harrison, R. A., Castoe, T. A., de Koning, A. P. J., Pollock, D. D., Yandell, M., Calderon, D., Renjifo, C., Currier, R. B., Salgado, D., Pla, D., Sanz, L., Hyder, A. S., Ribeiro, J. M. C., Arntzen, J. W., van den Thillart, G. E. E. J. M., Boetzer, M., Pirovano, W., Dirks, R. P., Spaink, H. P., Duboule, D., McGlinn, E., Kini, R. M., & Richardson, M. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-12-02
Volume
110
Issue
51
Pages
20651-20656
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2150146437
Cited by
474
References
7
FWCI
32.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.