Cited by 234Polysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Sensitivity-enhanced solid-state NMR detection of expansin’s target in plant cell walls

Open access
Wang, Tuo, Park, Yong Bum, Caporini, Marc A., Rosay, Melanie, Zhong, Linghao, Cosgrove, Daniel J., Hong, Mei·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The protein expansin loosens the cell walls of plants for cell growth, but its carbohydrate target of binding has been elusive because of the difficulty of studying the noncrystalline plant cell wall by most structural biology techniques and the trace amount of expansin needed for wall loosening. We have now combined dynamic nuclear polarization sensitivity-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy with 13 C labeling of Arabidopsis thaliana plants and 13 C, 15 N labeling of expansin, to determine that expansin binds cellulose microfibrils to loosen the plant cell wall. The expansin binding site is enriched in the hemicellulose xyloglucan and has a different cellulose structure from bulk cellulose, shedding light on the mechanism of wall loosening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1316290110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AsymPolPOK and other biradicals are small, water-soluble molecules that diffuse through porous cell walls without disrupting their structure.

    “AsymPolPOK and other biradicals are small (2–3 nm), water-soluble molecules that diffuse through porous cell walls without disrupting their structure, enabling widespread use in the structural analysis of plant, fungal, algal, and bacterial cell wall materials as well as intact mammalian cells84–90.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Park, Y. B., Caporini, M. A., Rosay, M., Zhong, L., Cosgrove, D. J., & Hong, M.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
  • Bruker (United States) (US)
  • Bruker Biospin Corporation, Billerica, MA 01821; and
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-09-24
Volume
110
Issue
41
Pages
16444-16449
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2065158707
Cited by
234
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 3
FWCI
30.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001090, DE‐FG02‐, FG02-84ER13179, DEFG0284ER13179)
  • Energy Frontier Research Centers
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
expansin, plant cell wall, cellulose microfibrils, xyloglucan, pectin, dynamic nuclear polarization, spin diffusion, Arabidopsis thaliana, cell wall loosening, polysaccharide binding, molecular dynamics simulation
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Carbon Isotopes, Cell Wall, Cellulose, Glucans, Nitrogen Isotopes, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Plant Proteins, Xylans, Arabidopsis, Microfibrils, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review