Predator diversity hotspots in the blue ocean
Open accessAbstract
Concentrations of biodiversity, or hotspots, represent conservation priorities in terrestrial ecosystems but remain largely unexplored in marine habitats. In the open ocean, many large predators such as tunas, sharks, billfishes, and sea turtles are of current conservation concern because of their vulnerability to overfishing and ecosystem role. Here we use scientific-observer records from pelagic longline fisheries in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans to show that oceanic predators concentrate in distinct diversity hotspots. Predator diversity consistently peaks at intermediate latitudes (20-30 degrees N and S), where tropical and temperate species ranges overlap. Individual hotspots are found close to prominent habitat features such as reefs, shelf breaks, or seamounts and often coincide with zooplankton and coral reef hotspots. Closed-area models in the northwest Atlantic predict that protection of hotspots outperforms other area closures in safeguarding threatened pelagic predators from ecological extinction. We conclude that the seemingly monotonous landscape of the open ocean shows rich structure in species diversity and that these features should be used to focus future conservation efforts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This latitudinal pattern is similar to that previously found for the diversity of tunas and billfishes, as well as foraminifera and other zooplankton groups.
“This latitudinal pattern is similar to that previously found for the diversity of tunas and billfishes (Worm et al. 2003(Worm et al. , 2005)), as well as foraminifera and other zooplankton groups (Rutherford et al. 1999).”
From Effects of temperature on global patterns of tuna and billfish richness (2008) · cites this paper as Worm et al. 2003
Topographic features such as ocean fronts, reefs, shelf breaks and seamounts have been shown to be areas of high tuna and billfish abundance and diversity.
“Topographic features such as ocean fronts, reefs, shelf breaks and seamounts have been shown to be areas of high tuna and billfish abundance and diversity (reviewed by Worm et al. 2003).”
From Effects of temperature on global patterns of tuna and billfish richness (2008) · cites this paper as Worm et al. 2003
Cites
Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067728 · Cited by 1,691 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Brandt, A., Danovaro, R., De Mol, B., Escobar, E., German, C. R., Levin, L. A., Martinez Arbizu, P., Menot, L., Buhl-Mortensen, P., et al. (2010) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Understanding the Effects of Marine Biodiversity on Communities and Ecosystems
Stachowicz, J. J., Bruno, J. F., & Duffy, J. E. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095659 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Effects of temperature on global patterns of tuna and billfish richness
Boyce, D., Tittensor, D., & Worm, B. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07237 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal patterns of species richness in coastal cephalopods
Rosa, R., Pissarra, V., Borges, F. O., Xavier, J., Gleadall, I. G., Golikov, A., Bello, G., Morais, L., Lishchenko, F., Roura, Á., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00469 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., & Myers, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-08-07
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9884-9888
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC187874
- OpenAlex
- W2154203001
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Keywords
- pelagic predators, marine biodiversity, open ocean, tuna, sharks, billfish, sea turtles, overfishing, marine conservation, area closures, latitudinal gradient, habitat characteristics, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fisheries, Fishes, Marine Biology, Models, Biological, Oceans and Seas, Predatory Behavior, Turtles, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review