Cited by 81Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicyCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingAccounting and Financial Management

Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting

Open access
Kareiva, Peter M., McNally, Brynn W., McCormick, Steve, Miller, Tom, Ruckelshaus, Mary·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Multinational corporations play a prominent role in shaping the environmental trajectory of the planet. The integration of environmental costs and benefits into corporate decision-making has enormous, but as yet unfulfilled, potential to promote sustainable development. To help steer business decisions toward better environmental outcomes, corporate reporting frameworks need to develop scientifically informed standards that consistently consider land use and land conversion, clean air (including greenhouse gas emissions), availability and quality of freshwater, degradation of coastal and marine habitats, and sustainable use of renewable resources such as soil, timber, and fisheries. Standardization by itself will not be enough—also required are advances in ecosystem modeling and in our understanding of critical ecological thresholds. With improving ecosystem science, the opportunity for realizing a major breakthrough in reporting corporate environmental impacts and dependencies has never been greater. Now is the time for ecologists to take advantage of an explosion of sustainability commitments from business leaders and expanding pressure for sustainable practices from shareholders, financial institutions, and consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1408120111

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements in product carbon footprinting methodologies make it easier to develop high-quality environmental labels.

    “Improvements make it easier to develop high-quality environmental labels (50).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

  • Data generated by firm-level environmental reporting may help to inform product-level environmental footprinting.

    “Data generated by firm-level environmental reporting may help to inform product-level environmental footprinting (50).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kareiva, P. M., McNally, B. W., McCormick, S., Miller, T., & Ruckelshaus, M.
Affiliations
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (US)
  • 202 Scott Street, Mill Valley, CA 94941; and
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
112
Issue
24
Pages
7375-7382
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1578425118
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
17.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
Keywords
corporate environmental disclosure, environmental management, multinational corporations, sustainability standards, greenhouse gas emissions, freshwater availability, ecosystem modeling, ecological thresholds, corporate environmental impact, sustainable development
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Clothing, Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Decision Making, Ecology, Environment, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review