The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic study of modulation of ADAM-mediated ectodomain shedding by site-specific O-glycosylation
Abstract
Significance: Ectodomain shedding is a central event in a range of biological processes and pathways, however the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here we present evidence that site-specific O-glycosylation regulated by individual GalNAc-Transferase isoforms, serve to coregulate ectodomain shedding, predominantly through blocking of cleavage. Our general finding is exemplified by the specific role of a single GalNAc-T isoform (GalNAc-T2) in coregulating TNF-alpha release in vitro, ex vivo in isogenic cell models, and in vivo in mouse Galnt2 knockouts. Adding the large family of GalNAc-T isoforms to regulation of ectodomain shedding substantially increase the ability to fine-tune this important process on a substrate level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent study showed that ADAM17-mediated cleavage was negatively affected by O-glycosylation in most substrates, especially O-glycosylation sites within four amino acid residues from the cleavage sites.
“A recent study showed that ADAM17-mediated cleavage was negatively affected by O-glycosylation in most of the substrates, especially O-glycosylation sites within four amino acid residues from the cleavage sites (31).”
From ADAM17 mediates ectodomain shedding of the soluble VLDL receptor fragment in the retinal epithelium (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complete sequencing and characterization of 21,243 full-length human cDNAs
Ota, T., Suzuki, Y., Nishikawa, T., Otsuki, T., Sugiyama, T., Irie, R., Wakamatsu, A., Hayashi, K., Sato, H., Nagai, K., et al. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1285 · Cited by 925
Schjoldager, K. T.-B. G., & Clausen, H. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.014 · Cited by 193
Self-citationDifferential glycosylation regulates processing of lipoprotein receptors by γ-secretase
May, P., Bock, H. H., Nimpf, J., & Herz, J. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m305858200 · Cited by 142
Advances in mass spectrometry driven O-glycoproteomics
Levery, S. B., Steentoft, C., Halim, A., Narimatsu, Y., Clausen, H., & Vakhrushev, S. Y. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.026 · Cited by 111
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1242/dev.076398 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.112.21.3603 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm1548 · DOI
- 10.2174/138161209788682398 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1669 · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/3.2.97 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2013.79 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/glycob/cwr182 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1576 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4335 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00494-9 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M114.564666 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M112.389114 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00431.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.149989 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1019645108 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12723 · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/cwu089 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.287912 · DOI
- 10.1038/370558a0 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M602469200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.156950 · DOI
- 10.1161/hc3601.095932 · DOI
- 10.1086/513206 · DOI
- DJ Penington, I Bryant, 2nd DJ Riese, Constitutively active ErbB4 and ErbB2 mutants exhibit distinct biological activities. Cell Growth Differ 13, 247–256 (2002).
- 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10379 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M111.013649 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1731 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1203563109 · DOI
- 10.1038/onc.2011.194 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01074.x · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/cwu046 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.iy.10.040192.002211 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.069997 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.02357 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.034 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.508440 · DOI
- 10.1038/359641a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82009-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M403193200 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ADAM17 mediates ectodomain shedding of the soluble VLDL receptor fragment in the retinal epithelium
Ma, X., Takahashi, Y., Wu, W., Liang, W., Chen, J., Chakraborty, D., Li, Y., Du, Y., Benyajati, S., & Ma, J.-X. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101185 · Cited by 9
Vaparanta, K., Merilahti, J. A. M., Ojala, V. K., & Elenius, K. (2024) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100780 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Goth, C. K., Halim, A., Khetarpal, S. A., Rader, D. J., Clausen, H., & Schjoldager, K. T.-B. G.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark;
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104;
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-11-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 14623-14628
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF107)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review