Cited by 225Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Ecosystem heterogeneity determines the ecological resilience of the Amazon to climate change

Open access
Levine, Naomi M., Zhang, Ke, Longo, Marcos, Baccini, Alessandro, Phillips, Oliver L., Lewis, Simon L., Alvarez-Dávila, Esteban, Segalin de Andrade, Ana Cristina +9 more·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Understanding how changes in climate will affect terrestrial ecosystems is particularly important in tropical forest regions, which store large amounts of carbon and exert important feedbacks onto regional and global climates. By combining multiple types of observations with a state-of-the-art terrestrial ecosystem model, we demonstrate that the sensitivity of tropical forests to changes in climate is dependent on the length of the dry season and soil type, but also, importantly, on the dynamics of individual-level competition within plant canopies. These interactions result in ecosystems that are more sensitive to changes in climate than has been predicted by traditional models but that transition from one ecosystem type to another in a continuous, non–tipping-point manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1511344112

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amazonian forests are heterogeneous in their resilience to disturbances, which may have contributed to buffering large-scale transitions in the past.

    “Amazonian forests are heterogeneous in their resilience to disturbances, which may have contributed to buffering large-scale transitions in the past37,61,62.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Significance section describes heterogeneous responses to a drying climate and says forest reorganization can buffer against drastic threshold changes in vegetation state. It discusses predicted future changes, however, not evidence that heterogeneity buffered large-scale transitions in the past; its analysis also focuses on climate-related water stress rather than disturbances generally. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Significant effects on simulation results may emerge from increasing plant functional diversity, representation of key physiological trade-offs and other features that determine water stress on plants, and allowing for community adjustment to environmental heterogeneity and global change.

    “Significant effects on simulation results may emerge from increasing plant functional diversity, representation of key physiological trade-offs and other features that determine water stress on plants, and also allowing for community adjustment to environmental heterogeneity and global change32,55,62,99.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Significance section (page unavailable) shows that representing individual plant water stress and canopy dynamics, rather than an aggregated canopy, substantially changes simulated forest responses. It also predicts changes in forest composition following drought. Our copy does not specifically show that increasing plant functional diversity or representing key physiological trade-offs produces significant effects on simulation results. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Simulating individual trees can improve the representation of growth and mortality dynamics, which ultimately affect forest dynamics.

    “Simulating individual trees can improve the representation of growth and mortality dynamics, which ultimately affect forest dynamics (for example, refs. 61,62,99).”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Boisier JP, Ciais P, Ducharne A, Guimberteau M (2015) Projected strengthening of Ama- zonian dry season by constrained climate model simulations. Nat Clim Chang 5(7):656-660.
  2. Malhi Y, et al. (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319(5860):169-172.
  3. Chou C, Neelin JD (2004) Mechanisms of global warming impacts on regional tropical precipitation. J Clim 17(13):2688-2701.
  4. Malhi Y, et al. (2009) Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change- induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(49):20610-20615.
  5. Fu R, et al. (2013) Increased dry-season length over southern Amazonia in recent decades and its implication for future climate projection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(45):18110-18115.
  6. Cox PM, et al. (2004) Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projec- tions for the 21st century. Theor Appl Climatol 78(1-3):137-156.
  7. Good P, et al. (2011) Quantifying environmental drivers of future tropical forest ex- tent. J Clim 24(5):1337-1349.
  8. Thompson SL, et al. (2004) Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophys Res Lett 31(23):L23211.
  9. Cox PM, et al. (2013) Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability. Nature 494(7437):341-344.
  10. Huntingford C, et al. (2013) Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2- induced climate change. Nat Geosci 6(4):268-273.
  11. Zhang K, et al. (2015) The fate of Amazonian ecosystems over the coming century arising from changes in climate, atmospheric CO2, and land use. Glob Change Biol 21(7): 2569-2587.
  12. Galbraith D, et al. (2010) Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change. New Phytol 187(3): 647-665.
  13. Malhi Y, et al. (2004) The above-ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots. Glob Change Biol 10(5):563-591.
  14. Quesada CA, et al. (2012) Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences 9(6):2203-2246.
  15. ter Steege H, et al. (2006) Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443(7110):444-447.
  16. Baraloto C, et al. (2011) Disentangling stand and environmental correlates of aboveground biomass in Amazonian forests. Glob Change Biol 17(8):2677-2688.
  17. Phillips OL, et al. (2004) Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 1976-2001. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359(1443):381-407.
  18. Baker TR, et al. (2004) Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Glob Change Biol 10(5):545-562.
  19. Moorcroft PR, Hurtt GC, Pacala SW (2001) A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: The ecosystem demography model (ED). Ecol Monogr 71(4):557-585.
  20. Nepstad DC, Tohver IM, Ray D, Moutinho P, Cardinot G (2007) Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. Ecology 88(9):2259-2269.
  21. da Costa ACL, et al. (2010) Effect of 7 yr of experimental drought on vegetation dynamics and biomass storage of an eastern Amazonian rainforest. New Phytol 187(3):579-591.
  22. Staver AC, Archibald S, Levin SA (2011) The global extent and determinants of sa- vanna and forest as alternative biome states. Science 334(6053):230-232.
  23. Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2011) Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334(6053):232-235.
  24. Phillips OL, et al. (2009) Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323(5919): 1344-1347.
  25. Laurance WF, et al. (1999) Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: A landscape-scale study. For Ecol Manage 118(1-3):127-138.
  26. Jimenez EM, et al. (2014) Edaphic controls on ecosystem-level carbon allocation in two contrasting Amazon forests. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 119(9):1820-1830.
  27. Hodnett MG, Tomasella J (2002) Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: A new water-retention pedo-transfer functions developed for tropical soils. Geoderma 108(3-4):155-180.
  28. Marthews TR, et al. (2014) High-resolution hydraulic parameter maps for surface soils in tropical South America. Geosci Model Development 7(3):711-723.
  29. Schuldt B, Leuschner C, Brock N, Horna V (2013) Changes in wood density, wood anatomy and hydraulic properties of the xylem along the root-to-shoot flow path in tropical rainforest trees. Tree Physiol 33(2):161-174.
  30. Oliveira RS, Dawson TE, Burgess SS, Nepstad DC (2005) Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145(3):354-363.
  31. Rammig A, et al. (2010) Estimating the risk of Amazonian forest dieback. New Phytol 187(3):694-706.
  32. Chadwick R, Boutle I, Martin G (2012) Spatial patterns of precipitation change in CMIP5: Why the rich do not get richer in the tropics. J Clim 26(11):3803-3822.
  33. Dwyer E, Pereira JMC, Gregoire JM, DaCamara CC (2000) Characterization of the spatio-temporal patterns of global fire activity using satellite imagery for the period April 1992 to March 1993. J Biogeogr 27(1):57-69.
  34. Baillie IC (1996) Soils of the humid tropics. The Tropical Rainforest, ed Richards PW (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), 2nd Ed, pp 256-286.
  35. Levin SA, Grenfell B, Hastings A, Perelson AS (1997) Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystems science. Science 275(5298):334-343.
  36. Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR, Pacala SW, Levin SA (1998) Terrestrial models and global change: Challenges for the future. Glob Change Biol 4(5):581-590.
  37. Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood EF (2006) Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J Clim 19(13):3088-3111.
  38. Quesada CA, et al. (2010) Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7(5):1515-1541.
  39. Global Soil Task (2000) . Global Soil Data Products CD_ROM, ed IGBP-DIS, 10.3334/ ORNLDAAC/565. · DOI
  40. Nakicenovic N, et al. (2000) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  41. Saatchi SS, et al. (2011) Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(24):9899-9904.
  42. Baker TR, et al. (2004) Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 359(1443): 353-365.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levine, N. M., Zhang, K., Longo, M., Baccini, A., Phillips, O. L., Lewis, S. L., Alvarez-Dávila, E., Segalin de Andrade, A. C., Brienen, R. J. W., Erwin, T. L., Feldpausch, T. R., Monteagudo Mendoza, A. L., Nuñez Vargas, P., Prieto, A., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Malhi, Y., & Moorcroft, P. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Jardín Botánico de Medellín, Grupo de Investigación en Servicios Ecosistémicos y Cambio Climático, 14 Medellin, Colombia;
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus - AM, 69067-375, Brazil;
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Jardín Botánico de Missouri, Oxapampa, Peru;
  • Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru;
  • Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogota, Colombia;
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Moorcroft, Paul R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-12-28
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
793-797
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2203684104
Cited by
225
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (AAI)
  • NOAA Climate and Global Change Fellowship (n/a)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (n/a)
  • European Research Council (n/a)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
Amazon rainforest, ecosystem resilience, climate change, ecosystem heterogeneity, dry season length, water stress, soil texture, forest biomass, forest composition, forest dynamics, forest decline, woody savannah, human disturbance, fire, logging
MeSH terms
Brazil, Dehydration, Seasons, Soil, Ecosystem, Biomass, Climate Change, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review