The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermodynamics and signatures of criticality in a network of neurons
Open accessAbstract
Significance: The activity of a brain—or even a small region of a brain devoted to a particular task—cannot be just the summed activity of many independent neurons. Here we use methods from statistical physics to describe the collective activity in the retina as it responds to complex inputs such as those encountered in the natural environment. We find that the distribution of messages that the retina sends to the brain is very special, mathematically equivalent to the behavior of a material near a critical point in its phase diagram.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Introduction to the theory of neural computation
(1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)90014-0 · Cited by 6,401
More Is Different: Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science.
Anderson, P. W. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393 · Cited by 4,018
Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets
Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I., & Shraiman, B. I. (1986) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.33.1141 · Cited by 3,302
Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code
Rieke, F. M., Warland, D., van Steveninck, R. R. D. R., & Bialek, W. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,844
Self-citationHalsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I., & Shraiman, B. I. (1986) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.34.1601 · Cited by 2,491
Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits
Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-35-11167.2003 · Cited by 2,325
Modeling Brain Function: The World of Attractor Neural Networks
Amit, D. J. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623257 · Cited by 2,227
Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429499661 · Cited by 1,772
Cited by
The BrainScaleS-2 Accelerated Neuromorphic System With Hybrid Plasticity
Pehle, C., Billaudelle, S., Cramer, B., Kaiser, J., Schreiber, K., Stradmann, Y., Weis, J., Leibfried, A., Müller, E., & Schemmel, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.795876 · Cited by 233
Rigidity transitions in development and disease
Hannezo, E., & Heisenberg, C.-P. (2022) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.12.006 · Cited by 69
Multiplex visibility graphs to investigate recurrent neural network dynamics
Bianchi, F. M., Livi, L., Alippi, C., & Jenssen, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44037 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Tkačik, G., Mora, T., Marre, O., Amodei, D., Palmer, S. E., Berry, M. J., & Bialek, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 11508-11513
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1881334935
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermodynamics and signatures of criticality in a network of neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1514188112
- The paper
- Tkačik, G., Mora, T., Marre, O., Amodei, D., Palmer, S. E., Berry, M. J., & Bialek, W. (2015). Thermodynamics and signatures of criticality in a network of neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514188112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.