Behavioral response inhibition and maturation of goal representation in prefrontal cortex after puberty
Open accessAbstract
Executive functions including behavioral response inhibition mature after puberty, in tandem with structural changes in the prefrontal cortex. Little is known about how activity of prefrontal neurons relates to this profound cognitive development. To examine this, we tracked neuronal responses of the prefrontal cortex in monkeys as they transitioned from puberty into adulthood and compared activity at different developmental stages. Performance of the antisaccade task greatly improved in this period. Among neural mechanisms that could facilitate it, reduction of stimulus-driven activity, increased saccadic activity, or enhanced representation of the opposing goal location, only the latter was evident in adulthood. Greatly accentuated in adults, this neural correlate of vector inversion may be a prerequisite to the formation of a motor plan to look away from the stimulus. Our results suggest that the prefrontal mechanisms that underlie mature performance on the antisaccade task are more strongly associated with forming an alternative plan of action than with suppressing the neural impact of the prepotent stimulus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural recordings in the prefrontal cortex during behavior suggest that adult improvements in antisaccade performance may be due to increased preparation for an alternate course of action and not due to suppression of the visual stimulus.
“Neural recordings in the prefrontal cortex during behavior suggest that adult improvements in performance may be due to increased preparation for an alternate course of action and not due to suppression of the visual stimulus.”
From Does puberty mark a transition in sensitive periods for plasticity in the associative neocortex? (2017) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Zhu, D., King, S. G., Lees, C. J., Bennett, A. J., Salinas, E., Stanford, T. R., & Constantinidis, C.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-03-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3353-3358
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4812761
- OpenAlex
- W2293051574
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (R33MH86946)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- response inhibition, prefrontal cortex, puberty, brain maturation, executive function, antisaccade task, goal representation, saccades, motor planning, rhesus monkeys, neuronal activity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Macaca mulatta, Male, Sexual Maturation, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review