The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature?
Open accessAbstract
The apparently rapid increase in the prevalence of amphibian limb deformities has led to substantial interest from ecologists and public health professionals. Hypotheses proposed to explain the deformities fall into two broad categories: chemical contaminants and trematode infection. Although there are convincing experimental demonstrations that certain factors can lead to some deformities, the causes for recent increases in amphibian malformation remain controversial. Moreover, no experimental studies on amphibian deformities have been conducted in the field, and no studies have attempted to examine the synergistic effects of trematode infection and exposure to chemical contaminants. Here, I present the results of field and laboratory experiments that link increased trematode infection, and increased limb deformities, to pesticide exposure. Field experiments conclusively demonstrated that exposure to trematode infection was required for the development of limb deformities in wood frogs,Rana sylvatica. However, deformities were more common at sites adjacent to agricultural runoff. Laboratory experiments corroborated the association between pesticide exposure and increased infection with pesticide-mediated immunocompetency as the apparent mechanism. Given the conservative contaminant exposure levels used [Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards] and the widespread use of many pesticides, these negative impacts may help to explain pathogen-mediated amphibian declines in many regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain
Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., & Campbell, J. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19297 · Cited by 1,429
Cited by
Hooper, M. J., Ankley, G. T., Cristol, D. A., Maryoung, L. A., Noyes, P. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2013) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2043 · Cited by 390
AGRICULTURAL PONDS SUPPORT AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS
Knutson, M. G., Richardson, W. B., Reineke, D. M., Gray, B. R., Parmelee, J. R., & Weick, S. E. (2004) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/02-5305 · Cited by 373
UNDERSTANDING THE NET EFFECTS OF PESTICIDES ON AMPHIBIAN TREMATODE INFECTIONS
Rohr, J. R., Raffel, T. R., Sessions, S. K., & Hudson, P. J. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1429.1 · Cited by 209
Environmental synergisms and extinctions of tropical species
LAURANCE, W. F., & USECHE, D. C. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01336.x · Cited by 178
Ecophysiology meets conservation: understanding the role of disease in amphibian population declines
Blaustein, A. R., Gervasi, S. S., Johnson, P. T. J., Hoverman, J. T., Belden, L. K., Bradley, P. W., & Xie, G. Y. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0011 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiesecker, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-07-12
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 9900-9904
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1998631479
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.152098899
- The paper
- Kiesecker, J. M. (2002). Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152098899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.