Visualizing the origins of selfish de novo mutations in individual seminiferous tubules of human testes
Open accessAbstract
Significance: A major goal in genetics is to understand the processes that shape the frequency of new mutations, particularly those causing human disease. Here, we focus on specific mutations in the male germline that, although initially rare, confer a growth or survival advantage to the stem cell, leading to clonal expansion over time: a process similar to early tumor growth and currently described only in humans. Previous studies supporting this “selfish” selection quantified mutations in sperm or testis pieces using methods that destroyed their cellular origins. Here, we pinpoint and identify pathogenic mutations directly within individual seminiferous tubules, the structures that generate spermatozoa. This methodology provides unprecedented precision in documenting the spectrum and prevalence of selfish mutations in men’s testes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 12 known germline selection genes all operate through activation of the RAS-MAPK signalling pathway.
“we initially focused on the 12 known germline selection genes, which all operate through activation of the RAS-MAPK signalling pathway25,26.”
From Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Maher, G. J., McGowan, S. J., Giannoulatou, E., Verrill, C., Goriely, A., & Wilkie, A. O. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-02-08
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2454-2459
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4780627
- OpenAlex
- W2262141199
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (091182, 102731)
- Simons Foundation (332759)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- de novo mutations, seminiferous tubules, male germline, spermatogonia, MAGE-A4, FGFR3, FGFR2, PTPN11, HRAS, KRAS, gain-of-function mutations, whole genome amplification, microdissection
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Male, Mutation, Seminiferous Tubules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review